Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Canino Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$65k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Environment$145kFood & Nutrition$120kHealth$115kEducation$80kPublic Benefit$60kCivil Rights$30kReligion$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$703k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOPE SDA CHURCH$25,000
DEMOCRACY NOW$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$10,000
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $20k → 14%REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$540k · 12 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$540k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+39%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationFood & NutritionArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FI
    FOODSHARE INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $85k · revenue +65%
  • RF
    REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $30k · revenue +58%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $25k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • CU
    CLARKSON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -10%
  • RI
    Rose-Hulman Institute of Technologygraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +39%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
2
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
3
Cdp North America Inc

Cdp north america, inc. 's ("cdp-na") vision for the future is a thriving economy that works for people and planet in the long term. we focus investors and companies on taking urgent action to build a truly sustainable economy by measuring…

Environment
4
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
5
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
6
Greenpeace Fund Inc

Greenpeace fund, inc. is a nonprofit corporation whose activities are directed primarily at protecting and preserving the environment. activities are executed mainly through the consideration and funding of grants to other organizations.

Environment
7
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
8
Connecticut Public Broadcasting Inc

Connecticut public broadcasting, inc. will inform, educate and inspire the people of connecticut, connecting and empowering the people of ct through outstanding journalism, storytelling, education and experiences, to make our state a more…

Arts & Culture
9
The Good Food Institute Inc

To harness the power of food innovation and markets to make the global food system better for the planet, people, and animals by supporting efforts to make alternative proteins accessible, affordable, and delicious.

Food & Nutrition
10
Food and Environment Reporting Network Inc

Fern seeks to make the food system more sustainable and equitable through powerful journalism and storytelling.

Food & Nutrition
11
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
12
Center for Science in the Public Interest

The center for science in the public interest is america's food and health watchdog. cspi envisions a healthy population with reduced impact and burden of preventable diseases and an equitable food system that makes healthy, sustainable…

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greenpeace Inc and the most unlike its peers is Outer Banks Dementia Friendly Coalition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GREENPEACE INC — $120,000 · OtherGREENPEACE INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD — $100,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODFOODSHARE INC — $85,000 · OtherFOODSHARE INCHARTFORD PUBLIC LIBRARY — $30,000 · OtherHARTFORD PUBLIC LIBRARYHOPE SDA CHURCH — $25,000 · OtherHOPE SDA CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $20,000 · Other+2 more — $20,000 · OtherDEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC — $60,000 · Arts & CultureDEMOCRACY N…CLARKSON UNIVERSITY — $20,000 · EducationHARTFORD PUBLIC LIBRARY — $20,000 · EducationCITY HARVEST INC — $20,000 · Food & NutritionBEACH FOOD PANTRY INC — $15,000 · Food & NutritionREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL — $30,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC — $25,000 · AnimalsOUTER BANKS DEMENTIA FRIENDLY COALITION — $15,000 · Health
Other$400,000Arts & Culture$60,000Education$40,000Food & Nutrition$35,000Human Services$30,000Animals$25,000Health$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGREENPEACE INC — $120,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFOODSHARE INC — $85,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC — $60,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC — $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCLARKSON UNIVERSITY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARTFORD PUBLIC LIBRARY — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBEACH FOOD PANTRY INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetOUTER BANKS DEMENTIA FRIENDLY COALITION — $15,000 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetRose-Hulman Institute of Technology — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREENPEACE INC
  • Who funds FOODSHARE INC
  • Who funds DEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC
  • Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL
  • Who funds CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds CLARKSON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds HARTFORD PUBLIC LIBRARY
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC
  • Who funds BEACH FOOD PANTRY INC
  • Who funds OUTER BANKS DEMENTIA FRIENDLY COALITION
  • Who funds Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Canino Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph