Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Vermont · Public charity

Cambridge Digital Bible Research

Cdbr exists to serve interpreters and translators of the bible by bringing them into robust discussion with the best of biblical scholarship and equipping them to hear the message of scripture.

$18k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
Organizations funded FY2022
0%
First-time grantees FY2022
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2022
$17,800
Largest grant, FY2022
$17,800
Organizations funded a year
1 to 1
FY2021 to FY2022
States reached, FY2022
1
Total assets, FY2022
$210k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2022, 0% of the organizations Cambridge Digital Bible Research funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20221$18k0%
FY20211$13kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2022.

Religion$31k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2022, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Wycliffe Bible Translators Inc$31,2002n/a

Compare Cambridge Digital Bible Research with peer funders

About Cambridge Digital Bible Research

How much does Cambridge Digital Bible Research give?
Cambridge Digital Bible Research reported 1 grants totaling $17,800 in its FY2022 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 1 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2022.
What does Cambridge Digital Bible Research fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2022, its largest causes are Religion (100%).
Who are Cambridge Digital Bible Research's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2022: Wycliffe Bible Translators Inc ($31k).
Does Cambridge Digital Bible Research fund new organizations?
In FY2022, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is Cambridge Digital Bible Research based?
Cambridge Digital Bible Research is based in VT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cambridge Digital Bible Research’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home