Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

California · Public charity

No on Prop 25 - Stop the Unfair Unsafe and Costly Ballot Proposition

Educating the public about the legal, financial, and technical impediments to be considered in the elimination of the cash bail system

$1.0M
Granted FY2020
2
Grants FY2020
2
Organizations funded FY2020
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2020
$1,000,000
Largest grant, FY2020
$1,000,000
States reached, FY2020
1

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2020, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
California Republican Party$1,000,0001n/a
Crime Victims United of California$13,791115%

Compare No on Prop 25 - Stop the Unfair Unsafe and Costly Ballot Proposition with peer funders

About No on Prop 25 - Stop the Unfair Unsafe and Costly Ballot Proposition

How much does No on Prop 25 - Stop the Unfair Unsafe and Costly Ballot Proposition give?
No on Prop 25 - Stop the Unfair Unsafe and Costly Ballot Proposition reported 2 grants totaling $1,013,791 in its FY2020 IRS filing.
What does No on Prop 25 - Stop the Unfair Unsafe and Costly Ballot Proposition fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2020, its largest causes are Public Benefit (99%), Crime & Legal (1%).
Who are No on Prop 25 - Stop the Unfair Unsafe and Costly Ballot Proposition's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2020: California Republican Party ($1.0M), Crime Victims United of California ($14k).
Where is No on Prop 25 - Stop the Unfair Unsafe and Costly Ballot Proposition based?
No on Prop 25 - Stop the Unfair Unsafe and Costly Ballot Proposition is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home