· Public charity
California State Council of Laborers
The purpose of the council is to improve the working conditions of laborers throughout california and to actively participate in the state legislative and administrative process.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $55,625 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $67,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $11,375 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NCL Scholarship Foundation | $20,000 |
| Mike Quevedo Sr Scholarship Fund | $19,125 |
| San Manuel Band of Mission Indians | $11,000 |
| CCEEB | $5,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 96% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against -40% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SCSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DISTRICT COUNCIL OF LABORERS MIKE QUEVEDO SR SCHOLARSHIP FUND5× · 2020–2024 · $81k · revenue +209%
- NCNorthern California Laborers Scholarship Foundation5× · 2020–2024 · $71k · revenue +46%
- CCCalifornia Council for Environmental and Economic Balance2× · 2023–2024 · $16k · revenue -4%
Funded once
- GIGOVERNORS INAUGURAL FUND 2019one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue -99%
- GCGOVERNORS CUP FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2022 · $40k · revenue -40%
- CSCALIFORNIA STATE PROTOCOL FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +79%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To support policies and ballot measures to curb increases in taxes throughout the state of California, including the qualification and passage of a proposed statewide initiative relating to the imposition of taxes and fees (California…
Support the 2023 inauguration of CA Governor Newsom.
The purpose of the organization is to provide objective, nonpartisan and balanced research analysis and commentary regarding legislation important to the California economy.
Communications to Californians on state legislation that expands taxation
The primary purpose of the organization is to examine and report on public policy issues related to Science and Technology that affect the State of California. CCST is a non-partisan, nonprofit organization that was established as an…
To conduct socio-economic demographic research, analysis, and advocacy related to communities of interest and voting rights in California.
To support or oppose ballot measures in California.
To support policies and ballot measures to support employment reform.
CalTaxs mission is to serve the general public and our members including Fortune 500 companies, small businesses and individuals by promoting sound tax policy and government efficiency at the state and local levels of government through…
Authorize Bond for Vote on 2018 Ballot
The AAUW California Special Projects Fund receives and distributes funds for programs and projects that further education and equity for all women and girls in California communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California State Protocol Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Governors Inaugural Fund 2019. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GOVERNORS INAUGURAL FUND 2019 ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DISTRICT COUNCIL OF LABORERS MIKE QUEVEDO SR SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
- Who funds Northern California Laborers Scholarship Foundation ↗
- Who funds GOVERNORS CUP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE PROTOCOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMITTEE TO SUPPORT THE OFFICE OF THE LT GOVERNOR ↗
- Who funds California Council for Environmental and Economic Balance ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA TRIBAL BUSINESS ALLIANCE ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization California State Council of Laborers funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.