Skip to content
Cacfp Assistance & Childcare Business Consulting Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Cacfp Assistance & Childcare Business Consulting Inc

CACFP Assistance & CBC serves as a Sponsor Organization for the NC Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) for Child Care Centers and Day Care Homes in order to assist in providing children more nutritious and tastier food.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$216k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$2.3MEducation$570kHuman Services$356kYouth Development$38kReligion$16kArts & Culture$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $140k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $320k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $569k
$10,370
Median grant
1
States reached
$35k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAYETTEVILLE LEARNING ACADEMY$216,401
THE LEARNING EXPERIENCE$131,272
Kids World Child Development Center$84,307
YOUNG MEMORIES LEARNING CENTER 2$81,772
YOUNG MEMORIES LEARNING CENTER$55,245
CHILDWORKS PRESCHOOL$40,429
Pam's Loving Hands Child Development Cen$35,832
LIL ANGELS DAY CARE$33,701
HOME OF THE SUPER KIDZ CHILDCARE CENTER$32,083
GODS LITTLE BLESSINGS DAYCARE LLC$23,591
CHILDREN OF TOMORROW$18,695
SUGAR BABIES CHILD CARE$16,451
LITTLE DISCIPLES OF JOY$16,045
Pink and Blue Childcare Services LLC$14,742
Kreative Kidz Family Childcare$12,843
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JOURNEY ADULT DAY CENTER: $12k → 16%JOURNEY ADULT DAY CENTER: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 33 repeat orgs$114k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
2

Total granted

$3.2M
$11k

Still filing today

3%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $103k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YM
    YOUNG MEMORIES LEARNING CENTER 2
    6× · 2020–2025 · $799k
  • KW
    Kids World Child Development Center
    6× · 2020–2025 · $420k
  • FL
    FAYETTEVILLE LEARNING ACADEMY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $280k

Funded once

  • LA
    Little Angels Child Care Center EC LLC
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
  • AA
    ABLE ANNIE'S CONSOLIDATED SERVICES
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2020–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2020 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
1/1
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOUNG MEMORIES LEARNING CENTER 2: $799,477 · OtherYOUNG MEMORIES LEARNING CENTER 2Kids World Child Development Center: $420,217 · OtherKids World Child Development CenterFAYETTEVILLE LEARNING ACADEMY: $280,248 · OtherFAYETTEVILLE LEARNING ACADEMYCORA'S CARING HANDS: $170,885 · OtherGROWING MIND S DAY CARE AND PRESCHOOL ACADEMY LLC: $154,816 · OtherTHE LEARNING EXPERIENCE: $142,605 · OtherGODS LITTLE BLESSINGS DAYCARE LLC: $119,920 · OtherHOME OF THE SUPER KIDZ CHILD CARE CENTER II: $112,259 · Other+34 more: $1,067,386 · Other+34 moreJourney Adult Day Center: $21,637 · Human Services
Other$3,267,813Human Services$21,637

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJourney Adult Day Center: $21,637 over 2y, 5.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Journey Adult Day Center ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cacfp Assistance & Childcare Business Consulting Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cacfp Assistance & Childcare Business Consulting Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY21–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cacfp Assistance & Childcare Business Consulting Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Cacfp Assistance & Childcare Business Consulting Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cacfp Assistance & Childcare Business Consulting’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home