Skip to content
Cabasso Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Cabasso Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$810k
Granted FY2025still arriving
41
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$552k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0176% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$5.6MHuman Services$239kEducation$132kHealth$93kFood & Nutrition$83kPhilanthropy$65kYouth Development$40kInternational$32kOther$0
02FY2025 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k33 grants · $79k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $103k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $77k
  • $250k+1 grant · $552k
$2,600
Median grant
3
States reached
$32k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AVENUE O SYNAGOGUE$552,000
AHAVAT SHALOM CHESED FUND$76,500
HECHAL HATORAH$24,000
KOLLEL OF JERSEY SHORE$24,000
LEV AMERICA TORAH CENTER$18,000
OHEL SIMHA SUPER FUND$15,000
KOLLEL OHR HATORAH$12,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
DSN COMMUNITY CENTER$6,000
SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM$5,500
HATZALAH EMS OF THE JERSEY SHORE$5,200
Individual grant recipient$4,500
Individual grant recipient$4,350
CONGREGATION GATES OF MERCY$4,000
AHAVAT HAIM VACHESED$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $209k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YAD CHAIM: $3k → 16%BIKUR CHOLIM STATEN ISLAND INC: $3k → 11%YAD CHAIM: $2k → 16%THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $10k → 11%THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $7k → 11%BELEV ECHAD: $1k → 17%EMAHOT FOUNDATION: $8k → 17%DEBORAH SALEM FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%A TIME: $6k → 20%OUR PLACE NY: $1k → 17%A TIME: $4k → 20%NISSIM VENIFLAOT: $4k → 11%A-TIME: $2k → 20%WE LOVE TO HELP: $4k → 20%MISASKIM: $4k → 20%MISASKIM: $3k → 20%NISSIM VENIFLAOT: $3k → 11%BONEI OLAM: $3k → 20%NETZACH FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%MISASKIM: $1k → 20%WE LOVE TO HELP INC: $1k → 20%CHAYIM ARUCHIM INC: $3k → 11%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $38k → 20%AHAVAT HAIM VACHESED: $5k → 6%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $11k → 20%AHAVAT HAIM VACHESED: $4k → 6%AHAVAT HAIM VACHESED: $4k → 6%AHAVAT HAIM VACHESED: $3k → 6%NISSIM VENIFLAOT: $1k → 11%DEAL FIRST AID SQUAD: $3k → 6%AHAVAT HAIM VACHESED: $2k → 6%NETZACH FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $6k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $5k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $3k → 20%EMAHOT FOUNDATION: $2k → 20%EMAHOT FOUNDATION: $1k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $1k → 20%MITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION: $8k → 20%MITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION: $7k → 20%MITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION: $4k → 20%MITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION: $4k → 20%MITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION: $1k → 20%EMAHOT FOUNDATION: $1k → 20%COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE FUND: $10k → 20%TAG FLATBUSH: $3k → 20%KETER SHLOMO FOUNDATION: $1k → 20%KETER SHLOMO FOUNDATION: $1k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CO
MD
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.0M · 225 repeat orgs$411k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

225 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2025, 192 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

225
175

Total granted

$7.0M
$394k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+14%

Still filing today

30%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YY
    YESHIVAT YAGDIL TORAH INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $170k · revenue +34%
  • MA
    MAGEN ABRAHAM YESHIVA INC CONGREGATION BNEI OVADIA
    6× · 2020–2025 · $69k · revenue ×12
  • TS
    THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $69k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • YM
    YESHIVA MIKDASH MELECH
    one grant, 2020 · $32k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $26k
  • CS
    CONGREGATION SHAARE ZION
    one grant, 2021 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
3
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
4
Sherit Isroel
—
5
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
6
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
7
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
8
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
9
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
10
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
11
Yeshiva Chayei Olam

Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…

Education
12
Friends of Yeshiva Tehilas Shlomo Inc

Provide support to further jewish education

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vaad Harabbanim L'inyanei Tzeduka Inc; the most unlike its peers is Team Hashem Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

123 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 123 of the 409 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
38
Early backer (in before they grew)
119/123
Grantees still filing
87/123
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AVENUE O SYNAGOGUE: $2,031,888 · OtherAVENUE O SYNAGOGUEAHAVAT SHALOM CHESED FUND: $424,200 · OtherAHAVAT SHALOM CHESED FUNDAHAVAT SHALOM: $337,200 · OtherAHAVAT SHALOMYAD YOSEF: $237,433 · Other+137 more: $3,004,294 · Other+137 moreMAGEN ABRAHAM YESHIVA INC CONGREGATION BNEI OVADIA: $69,200 · ReligionYESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC: $65,650 · ReligionSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY DAYANUT PROGRAM INC: $36,000 · ReligionKOLLEL OHR HATORAH INC: $30,600 · ReligionTALMUDICAL ACADEMY: $30,000 · ReligionTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $21,000 · ReligionYESHIVA MARBEH TORAH: $20,000 · ReligionOhr Halacha Inc: $18,800 · ReligionYeshivat Lev Torah: $17,500 · ReligionTHE KESHER ORGANIZATION INC: $13,000 · Religion+8 more: $56,300 · ReligionYESHIVAT YAGDIL TORAH INC: $169,950 · EducationBET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC: $24,900 · EducationILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $20,100 · EducationYESHIVA KETER TORAH INC: $18,900 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA OF KODSHIM: $15,200 · EducationTHE BRIDGE ACADEMY INC: $14,000 · EducationMATTAN BASSETER INC: $13,800 · EducationBAIS MEDRASH TORAS CHESED INC: $10,800 · Education+5 more: $27,000 · EducationSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $62,600 · Human ServicesMITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION CORP: $23,400 · Human ServicesTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $17,500 · Human ServicesAHAVAT HAIM VACHESED: $17,200 · Human ServicesA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $12,350 · Human ServicesEMAHOT FOUNDATION INC: $11,600 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ASSISTANCE FUND INC: $11,000 · Human ServicesNISSIM VENIFLAOT: $8,800 · Human ServicesMISASKIM CORP: $8,000 · Human Services+4 more: $17,800 · Human ServicesGEMAH BET YISRAEL INC: $31,000 · PhilanthropyKEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST: $15,500 · PhilanthropyYAD MICHAEL CHARITY INC: $10,200 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF IMREI DAAT INC: $9,700 · PhilanthropyTIFERET RABBI AKIVA: $7,200 · PhilanthropyTHE SHELLY COHEN BRIDAL FUND: $7,000 · PhilanthropyNavat Yisrael: $7,000 · PhilanthropySHARONS BRIDAL FUND INC: $6,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MESHI INC: $5,200 · PhilanthropyMAGEN AVRAHAM FUND: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $69,000 · Food & NutritionSEPHARDIC MEDICAL RESOURCES INC: $22,500 · HealthTEAM HASHEM INC: $8,000 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INC: $6,450 · HealthSIMHA ORGANIZATION INC: $5,000 · Health
Other$6,035,015Religion$378,050Education$314,650Human Services$190,250Philanthropy$103,800Food & Nutrition$69,000Health$41,950

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYESHIVAT YAGDIL TORAH INC: $169,950 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetMAGEN ABRAHAM YESHIVA INC CONGREGATION BNEI OVADIA: $69,200 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $69,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetYESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC: $65,650 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $62,600 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetDARCHEI DAVID FOUNDATION: $46,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY DAYANUT PROGRAM INC: $36,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetGEMAH BET YISRAEL INC: $31,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetKOLLEL OHR HATORAH INC: $30,600 over 4y, 12% of budgetTALMUDICAL ACADEMY: $30,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetDEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC: $26,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC: $24,900 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION CORP: $23,400 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetMASKEEL EL DAL SOCIETY: $22,800 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetSEPHARDIC MEDICAL RESOURCES INC: $22,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $21,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $20,100 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVA MARBEH TORAH: $20,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetYESHIVA KETER TORAH INC: $18,900 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOhr Halacha Inc: $18,800 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetYeshivat Lev Torah: $17,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $17,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAHAVAT HAIM VACHESED: $17,200 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetKEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST: $15,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA OF KODSHIM: $15,200 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BRIDGE ACADEMY INC: $14,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMATTAN BASSETER INC: $13,800 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE KESHER ORGANIZATION INC: $13,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $12,350 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYAD DAVID INC: $11,800 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTORAH LEARNING RESOURCES LTD: $11,800 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetEMAHOT FOUNDATION INC: $11,600 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetBAIS MEDRASH TORAS CHESED INC: $10,800 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYAD MICHAEL CHARITY INC: $10,200 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF IMREI DAAT INC: $9,700 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC: $8,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNISSIM VENIFLAOT: $8,800 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $8,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCONGREGATION RODFEH ZEDEK INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTEAM HASHEM INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetYAD MISHKAN INC: $7,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTIFERET RABBI AKIVA: $7,200 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE SHELLY COHEN BRIDAL FUND: $7,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetNavat Yisrael: $7,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $6,450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREACH FOR THE STARS LEARNING CENTER: $6,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHARONS BRIDAL FUND INC: $6,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetYESHIVAT OHEL TORAH: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YESHIVAT YAGDIL TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds MAGEN ABRAHAM YESHIVA INC CONGREGATION BNEI OVADIA ↗
  • Who funds THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC ↗
  • Who funds SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds DARCHEI DAVID FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY DAYANUT PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds GEMAH BET YISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds KOLLEL OHR HATORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds TALMUDICAL ACADEMY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Fou…The Howard Hoffman & …The Jimmy and Berta K…The Amin and Lillian …The Setton FoundationThe Adjmi-Dwek Founda…Marbeh Shalom Foundat…Ralph J Harary Founda…The Ralph S Gindi Fam…Isaac & Marjorie Gind…Chehebar Family Found…E R G Foundation
Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY167.2× affinity116 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · The Setton Foundation · The Adjmi-Dwek Foundation Inc · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc · Chehebar Family Foundation · E R G Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cabasso Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cabasso Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 330%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Bet Yaakov of the Jersey Shore Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc: 8% of income from government
  • The Special Children Center: 5% of income from government
  • Kollel of Greater Boston Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
33get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Cabasso Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Cabasso Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 409 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cabasso Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home