Skip to content
C&S Charities Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

C&S Charities Inc

Annual charity golf outings to benefit childhood cancer and hunger organizations.

$1.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$385k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$3.3MHealth$3.3MRecreation & Sports$790kPhilanthropy$31kPublic Safety & Disaster$20k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $175k
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.3M
$300,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$340k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AT DARTMOUTH$385,000
FEEDING AMERICA$310,000
SHARE OUR STRENGTH NO HUNGRY$310,000
DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$300,000
HOLE-IN-THE-WALL GANG CAMP$175,000
NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK$35,000
LOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK$20,000
HOLLINGS CANCER CENTER$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $115k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 18% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK: $35k → 7%NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK: $35k → 7%NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK: $25k → 7%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
IL
MA
CT
VA
SC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.4M · 8 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

$7.4M
$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+15%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthFood & NutritionHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Feeding America
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +40%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +95%
  • HI
    HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $790k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +15%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +22%
  • VF
    VERMONT FOODBANK
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
2
Food Bank of the Albemarle

To fight hunger and poverty in northeastern north carolina.

Food & Nutrition
3
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
4
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
5
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
6
Hunger Free Vermont Inc

To end the injustice of hunger for everyone and prioritize the people most affected by hunger to make a permanent systemic change.

Crime & Legal
7
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
8
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
9
Capital Area Food Bank Inc

The mission of the capital area food bank (the food bank or cafb) is to help our neighbors thrive by creating more equitable access to food and opportunity through community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
10
Second Harvest Heartland

Second harvest heartland's mission is to end hunger together. in partnership with more than 1,000 food shelves and hunger-relief programs in minnesota and western wisconsin, we provided 145 million meals to neighbors last year.

Food & Nutrition
11
Second Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc

To feed people by soliciting and distributing food and other products through partner agencies and educating the community about the nature of and solutions to problems of hunger.

Food & Nutrition
12
Food Bank Association of New York State

The mission of feeding new york state is to lead a unified effort for a hunger-free state of new york. the mission of food banking is to obtain food and deliver it to emergency food programs. feeding new york state works to end hunger by…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Food Bank of Western Massachusetts Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital: $1,895,000 · HealthMary Hitchcock Memorial HospitalDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,350,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc+1 more: $68,500 · HealthSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $1,565,000 · OtherSHARE OUR STRENGTHLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $68,500 · Other+1 more: $30,000 · OtherFeeding America: $1,565,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding America+1 more: $20,000 · Food & NutritionHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $790,000 · Recreation & SportsHOLE IN THE…New Hampshire Catholic Charities: $95,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $20,270 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $31,032 · Philanthropy
Health$3,313,500Other$1,663,500Food & Nutrition$1,585,000Recreation & Sports$790,000Human Services$115,270Philanthropy$31,032

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital: $1,895,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $1,565,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetFeeding America: $1,565,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,350,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $790,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $95,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $68,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION: $68,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $31,032 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $20,270 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVERMONT FOODBANK: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization C&S Charities Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from C&S Charities Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Vermont Foodbank: 13% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to C&S Charities Inc?

Find your warmest path to C&S Charities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on C&S Charities’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home