Skip to content

· Community foundation

Business Education Fund

BUSINESS EDUCATION FUND supports its flagship project, main street alliance, to: ensure authentic small business owners themselves are part of defining the problem and informing policy solutions so that the needs of even the smallest and least connected businesses are heard; recruit and support small business owners to share powerful…

$537k
Granted FY2021
41
Grants FY2021
23
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0172% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2021.

Community Improvement$313kArts & Culture$80kFood & Nutrition$50kCivil Rights$45kHuman Services$20kYouth Development$20kEnvironment$10kAnimals$10kOther$0
02FY2021 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 41 grants below total $435,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $537,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $102,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
23
States reached
$955k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAINE PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE$35,000
ALEIM ADORN INC DBA ODE TO BABEL$10,000
ATLANTIC SANDS INC$10,000
SOUTH RESTAURANT & JAZZ CLUB VV$10,000
LIEGE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
ARMAGEDDON BEACHPARTY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
LITTLEFIELD$10,000
REFUGE LIVE LLC$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
PIZZARIO$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 63% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SOLO'S CAFE: $10k → 11%TAP & PONY LLC: $10k → 11%SOUTH RESTAURANT & JAZZ CLUB VV: $10k → 22%LIEGE: $10k → 10%THE TRUCK STOP: $10k → 11%GOLD SOUNDS: $10k → 20%DARBLY: $10k → 16%EI Rey Productions: $10k → 27%DANGEROUSLY DELICIOUS DC LLC DBA PIE SHOP: $10k → 14%STILLWATER TAVERN: $10k → 12%SHORTYS LLC TA CENTER STREET GRILL: $10k → 15%xBk Live: $10k → 10%ARMAGEDDON BEACHPARTY: $10k → 21%PERFECT NOTE: $10k → 7%LBJ'S: $10k → 17%PIZZARIO: $10k → 8%Afrodaddy's Jazz: $10k → 12%OFF THE WAFFLE: $10k → 15%RHYTHMSLIVE MUSIC HALL: $10k → 11%MOJITO LOUNGE: $10k → 15%WHITE RABBIT PUB: $10k → 16%SPILLWAYBRIDGE LLC: $10k → 16%ELM STREET LOUNGE: $10k → 16%Chinese Southern Belle LLC: $10k → 8%James Hamelburg's albums: $10k → 13%BLACK AND BLUES MUSIC AND BREWS: $10k → 11%Phenix Banquet Center LLC: $10k → 15%IDENTITY INNOVATION INTERNATIONAL DBA CAPTIV8 CLEVELAND: $10k → 17%ROQUETTE: $10k → 9%NEW TERRA CAFE: $10k → 19%REFUGE LIVE LLC: $10k → 7%One Group Mind LLC dba The Comedy Clubhouse: $10k → 14%PROMTION WONDER BAR: $10k → 6%GURUPURAB LLC DBA OCEAN'S 14: $10k → 10%ATLANTIC SANDS INC: $10k → 19%ROGER BROWNS RESTAURANT: $10k → 20%SANTOS BAR: $10k → 23%BLUE MOON CAFE INC: $10k → 19%MAINE PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE: $35k → 7%Alna General Store: $10k → 9%UNIVERSITY PROPERTIES DBA YUCCA TAP ROOM: $10k → 11%Complex Oakland: $10k → 10%FRIENDS AND LOVERS INC: $10k → 20%The N'Namdi Center For Contemporary Art: $10k → 21%Whitetail MKE: $10k → 17%MONSTERCADE LLC: $10k → 15%Maine People's Alliance: $30k → 7%People's Action Institute: $63k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
OR
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
1/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAINE PEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER: $65,000 · OtherMAINE PEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER+64 more: $640,000 · Other+64 morePEOPLE'S ACTION INSTITUTE: $62,500 · Community ImprovementPEOPLE'S …THE N'NAMDI CENTER FOR CONTEMPORARY ART: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$705,000Community Improvement$62,500Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAINE PEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER: $65,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetPEOPLE'S ACTION INSTITUTE: $62,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE N'NAMDI CENTER FOR CONTEMPORARY ART: $10,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAINE PEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE'S ACTION INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE N'NAMDI CENTER FOR CONTEMPORARY ART ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Business Education Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Business Education Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Business Education Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Business Education Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $6k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Business Education’s filings →

    More from the funding graph