Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Burr Willie O Est Tr Residue

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$617k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Health$7.5MHuman Services$3.8MYouth Development$1.5MHousing & Shelter$1.5M
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k3 grants · $497k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.3M
$331,351
Median grant
1
States reached
$35M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES & CHILDREN$616,683
HARTFORD HOSPITAL$331,351
CCMC - CT CHILDRENS' MEDICAL CENTER$331,351
THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF HARTFORD$165,676
CIB -CONNECTICUT INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND$165,676
SHELTER FOR WOMEN OF HARTFORD$165,676
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

None of your grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$13M · 8 repeat orgs$768k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against +42% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

$13M
$768k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+42%

Still filing today

38%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TV
    THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN
    8× · 2018–2025 · $3.8M · revenue +92%
  • HH
    Hartford Hospital
    8× · 2018–2025 · $3.0M · revenue +63%
  • TB
    THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF HARTFORD
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • CC
    CONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $375k · revenue +42%
  • CI
    CT INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND
    one grant, 2020 · $206k
  • TC
    THE CONNECTICUT INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND INC
    one grant, 2021 · $187k · revenue +22%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
5/5
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SHELTER FOR WOMEN OF HARTFORD — $1,496,487 · OtherSHELTER FOR WOMEN OF HARTFORDCCMC - CT CHILDRENS' MEDICAL CENTER — $1,448,737 · OtherCCMC - CT CHILDRENS' MEDICAL CENTERCONN CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER — $1,169,555 · OtherCONN CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTERCIB -CONNECTICUT INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND — $724,369 · OtherCIB -CONNECTICUT INSTITUTE FOR THE BLINDCONNECTICUT INSTIT FOR THE BLIND — $379,262 · OtherCONNECTICUT INSTIT FOR THE BLINDCT INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND — $205,516 · OtherTHE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN — $3,767,018 · Human ServicesTHE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CH…THE CONNECTICUT INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND INC — $187,343 · Human ServicesHartford Hospital — $2,992,978 · HealthHartford HospitalCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER — $374,686 · HealthCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MED…THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF HARTFORD — $1,496,488 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BOYS AN…
Other$5,423,926Human Services$3,954,361Health$3,367,664Youth Development$1,496,488

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN — $3,767,018 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetHartford Hospital — $2,992,978 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF HARTFORD — $1,496,488 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER — $374,686 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CONNECTICUT INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND INC — $187,343 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN
  • Who funds Hartford Hospital
  • Who funds THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF HARTFORD
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER
  • Who funds THE CONNECTICUT INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Burr Willie O Est Tr Residue funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 20%
  • The Village for Families and Children50% of income from government
  • The Boys and Girls Clubs of Hartford20% of income from government
  • Connecticut Children's Medical Center5% of income from government
  • Hartford Hospital0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph