Skip to content

· Private foundation

Buckley Charitable Trust

Its FY2021 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$47k
Granted FY2021
17
Grants FY2021
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2021.

Education$41kHealth$8kEnvironment$2kAnimals$2kFood & Nutrition$2k
02FY2021 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k16 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COREY C GRIFFIN FOUNDATION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,500
NORWELL VISITING NURSE ASSOCATION$5,000
ERIN CROGHAN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$4,545
BOSTON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$3,473
ASHRAE CHAMPLAIN VALLEY CHAPTER$2,000
CHERYL ROSEN FUTURE ENGINEER SCHOLARSHIP$2,000
MAINE CHAPTER OF ASHRAE$2,000
ASHRAE GRANITE STATE CHAPTER$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
SCITUATE ANIMAL SHELTER$1,000
WEYMOUTH FOOD PANTRY$1,000
PLYMOUTH ANIMAL SHELTER$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 39% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WEYMOUTH FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 7%MASSACHUSETTS MARITIME ACADEMY: $1k → 8%DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARSHIPS: $6k → 8%WORCESTER STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST: $1k → 12%BOSTON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $3k → 16%ASHRAE BI-STATE: $2k → 9%CT ASHRAE: $2k → 11%ASHRAE CHAMPLAIN VALLEY CHAPTER: $2k → 10%ASHRAE GRANITE STATE CHAPTER: $2k → 10%MAINE CHAPTER OF ASHRAE: $2k → 12%COREY C GRIFFIN FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARSHIPS: $500 → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST: $2k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON: $1k → 16%DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARSHIPS: $500 → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST: $1k → 12%CHERYL ROSEN FUTURE ENGINEER SCHOLARSHIP: $2k → 16%DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARSHIPS: $500 → 8%SCITUATE ANIMAL SHELTER: $1k → 8%NORWELL VISITING NURSE ASSOCATION: $5k → 8%BRIDGEWATER STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 8%ERIN CROGHAN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%HANSON FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 8%ERIN CROGHAN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $500 → 8%ERIN CROGHAN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $500 → 8%ERIN CROGHAN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

31%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17k · 3 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

$17k
$3k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2018–2021 · $7k
  • EC
    ERIN CROGHAN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2021 · $6k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST
    3× · 2018–2021 · $4k

Funded once

  • BS
    BRIDGEWATER STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • MM
    MASSACHUSETTS MARITIME ACADEMY
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • WS
    WORCESTER STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
1/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COREY C GRIFFIN FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherCOREY C GRIFFIN FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientERIN CROGHAN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $6,045 · OtherERIN CROGHAN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATIONNorwell Visiting Nurse Association Inc: $5,000 · OtherNorwell Visiting Nurse Association IncUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST: $4,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERSTBOSTON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $3,473 · OtherBOSTON CHILDRENS HOSPITALASHRAE GRANITE STATE CHAPTER: $2,000 · OtherCHERYL ROSEN FUTURE ENGINEER SCHOLARSHIP: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherASHRAE CHAMPLAIN VALLEY CHAPTER: $2,000 · OtherMAINE CHAPTER OF ASHRAE: $2,000 · Other+7 more: $7,000 · Other+7 moreHANSON FOOD PANTRY INC (AKA HANSON FOOD PANTRY): $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$54,518Food & Nutrition$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNorwell Visiting Nurse Association Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHANSON FOOD PANTRY INC (AKA HANSON FOOD PANTRY): $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWEYMOUTH COUNCIL FOR THE HUNGRY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Norwell Visiting Nurse Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds HANSON FOOD PANTRY INC (AKA HANSON FOOD PANTRY) ↗
  • Who funds WEYMOUTH COUNCIL FOR THE HUNGRY INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Buckley Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Buckley Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Buckley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph