Skip to content

California · Public charity

Buck Institute for Research on Aging

To increase the healthy, productive years of life through basic biomedical research on aging and age-related diseases.

$4.0M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
14
Itemized grants FY2024
14
Organizations funded FY2023
57%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Buck Institute for Research on Aging’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Yale University, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Buck Institute for Research on Aging named its own grantees at scale: 13 organizations, $3M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

10
’20
10
’22
14
’23
13
’24
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Itemized, FY2024
$2.8M
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$100,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$650,000
Organizations funded a year
10 to 14
FY2020 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
9
Total assets, FY2024
$132M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 57% of the organizations Buck Institute for Research on Aging funded were first-time grantees, receiving 53% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23
HealthScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving13$2.8M0%
FY202314$2.9M57%
FY202210$2.1M0%
FY202010$2.2Mn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$12MScience & Tech$200k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
AR
OK
LA

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
University of California San Francisco$2,200,0004n/a
Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation$1,300,00021%
Northwestern University$800,00040%
Oregon Health & Science University$800,0002n/a
The Trustees of Princeton University$800,00020%
Magee-Womens Research Institute and Foundation$700,00040%
Regents of the University of California at Berkeley$500,0004n/a
Regents of the University of Michigan$500,0002n/a
University of Pittsburgh$400,00040%
Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research$400,00040%
Show all 18 grantees
All grantees of Buck Institute for Research on Aging by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
University of California San Francisco$2,200,0004n/a
Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation$1,300,00021%
Northwestern University$800,00040%
Oregon Health & Science University$800,0002n/a
The Trustees of Princeton University$800,00020%
Magee-Womens Research Institute and Foundation$700,00040%
Regents of the University of California at Berkeley$500,0004n/a
Regents of the University of Michigan$500,0002n/a
University of Pittsburgh$400,00040%
Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research$400,00040%
Marine Biological Laboratory$200,00020%
University of California Davis$200,0002n/a
Regents of the University of Colorado$200,0002n/a
The Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund$200,00020%
Women & Infants Hospital of Ri$200,00020%
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences$200,0002n/a
Regents of the University$200,0002n/a
The Broad Institute Inc$100,00010%

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Buck Institute for Research on Aging supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $1,300,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetNorthwestern University: $800,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $800,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMagee-Womens Research Institute and Foundation: $700,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetUniversity of Pittsburgh: $400,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research: $400,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMarine Biological Laboratory: $200,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund: $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWomen & Infants Hospital of Ri: $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Broad Institute Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 10.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Buck Institute for Research on Aging with peer funders

About Buck Institute for Research on Aging

How much does Buck Institute for Research on Aging give?
Buck Institute for Research on Aging reported 14 itemized grants totaling $2,839,884, out of $4,028,587 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 10 and 14 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2023.
What does Buck Institute for Research on Aging fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2024, its largest causes are Health (98%), Science & Tech (2%).
Who are Buck Institute for Research on Aging's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2024: University of California San Francisco ($2.2M), Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation ($1.3M), Northwestern University ($800k).
Does Buck Institute for Research on Aging fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 57% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Buck Institute for Research on Aging?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.
Where is Buck Institute for Research on Aging based?
Buck Institute for Research on Aging is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Buck Institute for Research on Aging’s filings →

More from the funding graph