Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Buccaneer Commission Inc

Educational and cultural programs

$364k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$792kHuman Services$299kPhilanthropy$100kArts & Culture$80kFood & Nutrition$61kReligion$6kScience & Tech$5k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $132,980 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $364,431 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $231,451 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MILITARY WARRIOR SUPPORT FOUNDATION$40,000
NUECES COUNTY JUNIOR LIVESTOCK ASSO$32,980
CC MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY$20,000
FIRST IN TEXAS$20,000
ART MUSEUM OF SOUTH TEXAS$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $299k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MILITARY WARRIOR SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $50k → 16%MILITARY WARRIORS SUPPORT FOUNDATIO: $50k → 16%MILITARY WARRIOR SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $40k → 16%MILITARY WARRIORS SUPPORT FOUNDATIO: $35k → 16%MILITARY WARRIORS SUPPORT FOUNDATIO: $35k → 16%MILITARY WARRIORS SUPPORT FOUNDATIO: $30k → 16%MILITARY WARRIORS SUPPORT FOUNDATIO: $25k → 16%FIRST IN TEXAS: $20k → 16%FIRST IN TEXAS: $14k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 7 repeat orgs$126k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
8

Total granted

$1.1M
$93k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
+1%

Still filing today

43%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BUCCANEER COMMISSION FOUNDATIONINC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $652k · revenue -87% · 100% of their budget
  • MW
    MILITARY WARRIORS SUPPORT FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2025 · $265k · revenue -22%
  • TA
    TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY-CORPUS CHRISTI
    6× · 2017–2024 · $70k

Funded once

  • CB
    COASTAL BEND FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2024 · $28k · revenue +1%
  • TA
    TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $21k
  • TC
    TEJANO CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/7
Grantees still filing
1/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BUCCANEER COMMISSION FOUNDATIONINC — $651,500 · EducationBUCCANEER COMMISSION FOUNDATIONINCMILITARY WARRIORS SUPPORT FOUNDATION — $265,000 · Human ServicesMILITARY WARRIORS SUPPORT…Foundation for Inspiration & Recognition of Scienc — $33,500 · Human ServicesFoundation for Inspiratio…TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY-CORPUS CHRISTI — $70,000 · OtherTEXAS A&M UNIVERSIT…CC MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY — $40,000 · OtherCC MUSEUM OF SCIENC…ART MUSEUM OF SOUTH TEXAS ENDOWMENT TRUST FUND — $40,000 · OtherART MUSEUM OF SOUTH…TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY — $20,500 · OtherTEXAS A&M UNIVERSIT…DEL MAR COLLEGE — $17,000 · OtherDEL MAR COLLEGETEJANO CENTER — $10,000 · OtherTEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY SYSTEM — $8,000 · Other+4 more — $26,250 · Other+4 moreCOASTAL BEND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $100,000 · PhilanthropyNUECES COUNTY JUNIOR LIVESTOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION INC — $32,980 · Youth DevelopmentCOASTAL BEND FOOD BANK — $28,257 · Food & Nutrition
Education$651,500Human Services$298,500Other$231,750Philanthropy$100,000Youth Development$32,980Food & Nutrition$28,257

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBUCCANEER COMMISSION FOUNDATIONINC — $651,500 over 6y, 100% of budgetMILITARY WARRIORS SUPPORT FOUNDATION — $265,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetCOASTAL BEND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFoundation for Inspiration & Recognition of Scienc — $33,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetNUECES COUNTY JUNIOR LIVESTOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION INC — $32,980 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCOASTAL BEND FOOD BANK — $28,257 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BUCCANEER COMMISSION FOUNDATIONINC
  • Who funds MILITARY WARRIORS SUPPORT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds COASTAL BEND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ART MUSEUM OF SOUTH TEXAS ENDOWMENT TRUST FUND
  • Who funds Foundation for Inspiration & Recognition of Scienc
  • Who funds NUECES COUNTY JUNIOR LIVESTOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds COASTAL BEND FOOD BANK

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX12.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Buccaneer Commission Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph