Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

New York · Private foundation

Brown Herbert D Tw Perf Art

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
1
Grants FY2025
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Brown Herbert D Tw Perf Art’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Central Pennsylvania Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

0
’24
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2025
$27,563
Largest grant, FY2025
$27,563
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$660k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Philanthropy$54k

Top grantees

Largest grants in FY2025.

CENTRAL PA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$27,563

Compare Brown Herbert D Tw Perf Art with peer funders

About Brown Herbert D Tw Perf Art

How much does Brown Herbert D Tw Perf Art give?
Brown Herbert D Tw Perf Art reported 1 grants totaling $27,563 in its FY2025 IRS filing.
What does Brown Herbert D Tw Perf Art fund?
By grant dollars, its largest causes are Philanthropy (100%).
Does Brown Herbert D Tw Perf Art accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Where is Brown Herbert D Tw Perf Art based?
Brown Herbert D Tw Perf Art is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Brown Herbert D Tw Perf Art’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home