Skip to content

· Private foundation

Brown Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$172k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$428kHealth$349kHuman Services$164kPhilanthropy$105kYouth Development$86k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $163k
$17,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER$25,000
DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$25,000
THE CHILDREN'S ROOM-CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN & TEENAGERS INC$20,000
THE PINE STREET INN$18,000
BIRTHDAY WISHES INC$17,000
ROSIE'S PLACE$17,000
SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE$15,000
THE WOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE$13,000
BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS INC$13,000
PROJECT SMILE$5,500
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS$3,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $392k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MASSACHUSETTS COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $1k → 10%PROJECT SMILE: $6k → 11%PROJECT SMILE: $5k → 11%PROJECT SMILE: $5k → 11%THE PINE STREET INN: $18k → 16%PROJECT SMILE: $5k → 11%PROJECT SMILE: $5k → 11%THE PINE STREET INN: $17k → 16%PROJECT SMILE: $5k → 11%PROJECT SMILE: $5k → 11%THE PINE STREET INN: $16k → 16%PROJECT SMILE: $5k → 11%THE PINE STREET INN: $15k → 16%PROJECT SMILE: $4k → 11%THE PINE STREET INN: $15k → 16%THE CHILDREN'S ROOM-CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN & TEENAGERS INC: $20k → 8%THE CHILDREN'S ROOM-CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN & TEENAGERS INC: $18k → 8%THE PINE STREET INN: $14k → 16%THE CHILDREN'S ROOM-CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN & TEENAGERS INC: $16k → 8%THE CHILDREN'S ROOM-CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN & TEENAGERS INC: $14k → 8%THE CHILDREN'S ROOM-CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN & TEENAGERS INC: $14k → 8%THE CHILDREN'S ROOM-CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN & TEENAGERS INC: $12k → 8%THE PINE STREET INN: $12k → 16%THE CHILDREN'S ROOM-CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN & TEENAGERS INC: $10k → 8%THE PINE STREET INN: $12k → 16%THE CHILDREN'S ROOM-CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN & TEENAGERS INC: $10k → 8%THE PINE STREET INN: $11k → 16%THE CHILDREN'S ROOM-CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN & TEENAGERS INC: $9k → 8%SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE: $15k → 16%SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE: $14k → 16%SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE: $12k → 16%SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE: $12k → 16%SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE: $11k → 16%SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE: $10k → 16%SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE: $9k → 16%SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE: $9k → 16%SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 11 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +99% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$1.1M
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+99%
+35%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BI
    BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $166k · revenue +99%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $160k · revenue +162%
  • PINE STREET INN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $129k · revenue +123%

Funded once

  • MASSACHUSETTS COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Brien Center for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services

The brien center provides a continuum of care for children, adolescents, adults and families living with significant and persistent mental health and substance use disorders. we are guided by the belief that everyone in berkshire county…

Health
2
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
3
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
4
Abby Kelley Foster House Inc

To provide shelter and affordable housing, as well as advocacy and support services, to homeless, battered and low-income women, with or without children. abby's house empowers the women we serve to lead self-directed lives filled with…

Housing & Shelter
5
Mary's Shelter

Mary's shelter is committed to empowering homeless youth by providing housing, education, and social service programs.

Human Services
6
Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program Inc

The mission of the boston health care for the homeless program (bhchp) is to provide or assure access to the highest quality health care for all individuals and families experiencing homelessness in our community.

Human Services
7
Winchester Hospital

The mission of winchester hospital is "to care. to heal. to excel." this ethos provides each and every staff member with clear expectations, promoting teamwork and respect while ensuring safety, quality and empathy for patients. winchester…

Health
8
Project Hope Boston Inc

Project hope is a multi service agency that moves families up and out of poverty.project hope works in partnership with women and families in the dorchester and roxbury neighborhoods of boston on their journeys up and out of poverty. we do…

Human Services
9
Pine Street Inn Housing Ii Inc

Pine street inn housing ii, inc. is a massachusetts not-for-profit corporation, which was organized to provide ten elderly individuals with housing facilities and services at the inn's menino house at geneva avenue in boston,…

Housing & Shelter
10
Citizens Inn Inc

The organization's mission is to prevent and end hunger and homelessness by providing integrated services that promote long-term stability, health, and independence. (see schedule o for full description)

Housing & Shelter
11
Veterans Inc

Veterans inc.'s mission is to end homelessness among veterans by helping veterans regain control of their lives. we believe that all veterans have earned respect and gratitude from our nation. this belief is translated into the philosophy…

Community Improvement
12
Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital - Milton

The mission of the beth israel deaconess hospital-milton, inc. (bid-milton or hospital) is to provide safe, high-quality, community-based health care and access to tertiary care in close collaboration with its sister hospital, beth israel…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint Francis House Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $166,000 · HealthBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INCDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $159,500 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute IncBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS INC: $86,000 · HealthBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS INCMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS AND RHODE ISLAND INC: $23,500 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS AND…PINE STREET INN INC: $129,000 · Human ServicesPINE STREET INN INCThe Childrens Room Center for Grieving Children: $121,500 · Human ServicesThe Childrens Room Center for Grieving …SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC: $98,500 · Human ServicesSAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INCPROJECT SMILE INC: $42,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT SMILE INC+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesROSIE'S PLACE INC: $120,000 · Housing & ShelterROSIE'S PLAC…Birthday Wishes Inc: $105,000 · PhilanthropyBirthday W…WOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC: $79,000 · Other
Health$435,000Human Services$392,000Housing & Shelter$120,000Philanthropy$105,000Other$79,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $166,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $159,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC: $129,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe Childrens Room Center for Grieving Children: $121,500 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC: $120,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBirthday Wishes Inc: $105,000 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetSAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC: $98,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS INC: $86,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC: $79,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetPROJECT SMILE INC: $42,000 over 9y, 19% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS AND RHODE ISLAND INC: $23,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
  • Who funds The Childrens Room Center for Grieving Children ↗
  • Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds Birthday Wishes Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS AND RHODE ISLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern Bank FoundationMA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brown Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brown Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Bridge Over Troubled Waters Inc: 32% of income from government
  • Saint Francis House Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Women's Lunch Place Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Brown’s filings →

More from the funding graph