Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

New York · Public charity

Brooklyn Bridge Park Conservancy Inc

The conservancy's mission is to cultivate and promote interest in brooklyn bridge park. We hold events to engage and educate individuals about the history of, and the importance of preserving and supporting, the park. This past year, we also produced more than 600 free and low-cost educational, cultural, fitness and recreational programs…

$483k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
3
Grants FY2024
3
Organizations funded FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$184,206
Largest grant, FY2024
$203,839
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$880k
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Youth Development$500kPublic Benefit$250k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Greater Ridgewood Youth Council Inc$250,00021%
New York City H2o Inc$250,000217%
St Ann's Warehouse Inc$250,00022%

Compare Brooklyn Bridge Park Conservancy Inc with peer funders

About Brooklyn Bridge Park Conservancy Inc

How much does Brooklyn Bridge Park Conservancy Inc give?
Brooklyn Bridge Park Conservancy Inc reported 3 grants totaling $483,404 in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does Brooklyn Bridge Park Conservancy Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2024, its largest causes are Youth Development (67%), Public Benefit (33%).
Who are Brooklyn Bridge Park Conservancy Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2023 to FY2024: Greater Ridgewood Youth Council Inc ($250k), New York City H2o Inc ($250k), St Ann's Warehouse Inc ($250k).
Where is Brooklyn Bridge Park Conservancy Inc based?
Brooklyn Bridge Park Conservancy Inc is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Brooklyn Bridge Park Conservancy’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home