Skip to content

· Private foundation

Brighton Oak Charitable Foundation

Charitable foundation Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$1,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$678k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Lift up the vunerable$20,000
Wycliffe Bible T$9,100
Individual grant recipient$5,807
Zongolica Church$4,635
Allegro$1,000
Angel Tree Prison Fellowship$1,000
Asia Harvest$1,000
Compassion$994
Int Fellowship of christian and jews$900
Shepherdsstaffmi$700
Transworld Radio$100
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 77% of grant dollars ($35k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 23% that went abroad ($10k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 32% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Allegro: $1k → 16%Wycliffe Bible T: $9k → 13%Lift up the vunerable: $20k → 7%Asia Harvest: $1k → 10%Compassion: $994 → 9%Int Fellowship of christian and jews: $900 → 14%Angel Tree Prison Fellowship: $1k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
CO
VA
TN
NC
AL
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 23% of all-years giving ($10k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Mexico$10k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its field
03the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/4
Grantees still filing
1/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Wycliffe Bible T: $9,100 · OtherWycliffe Bible TIndividual grant recipient: $5,807 · OtherIndividual grant recipientZongolica Church: $4,635 · OtherZongolica ChurchAngel Tree Prison Fellowship: $1,000 · OtherInt Fellowship of christian and jews: $900 · Other+2 more: $800 · OtherLIFT UP THE VULNERABLE INC: $20,000 · InternationalLIFT UP THE VULNERABLE INCASIA HARVEST INC: $1,000 · InternationalCompassion International Incorporated: $994 · InternationalAllegro: $1,000 · Membership Benefit
Other$22,242International$21,994Membership Benefit$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIFT UP THE VULNERABLE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAllegro: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetASIA HARVEST INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIFT UP THE VULNERABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds Allegro ↗
  • Who funds ASIA HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brighton Oak Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brighton Oak Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Brighton Oak Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Brighton Oak Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Brighton Oak’s filings →

    More from the funding graph