Skip to content

· Private foundation

Briar Hollow Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$126k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$222kReligion$184kEducation$105kRecreation & Sports$60kCommunity Improvement$19kHuman Services$19kArts & Culture$15kPublic Safety & Disaster$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $66k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL$41,000
FRIENDS OF PUMPKIN PARK$25,000
ST MARTIN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$6,000
SILVER CREEK HERITAGE SOCIETY$5,200
ST MICHAEL'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$5,000
HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$5,000
RICE UNIVERSITY$5,000
HUNT METHODIST CHURCH$5,000
FIRST METHODIST CHURCH$5,000
WALDEMAR LEGACY FUND$5,000
MENNINGER CLINIC$2,500
ST FRANCIS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$2,500
HOPE & HEALING CENTER$2,000
THE CHILDRENS FUND$1,500
THETA CHARITY EVENTS$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PATHWAYS FOR LITTLE FEET: $5k → 16%DEPELCHIN CHILDRENS CENTER: $5k → 16%DEPELCHIN CHILDRENS CENTER: $5k → 16%DEPELCHIN CHILDRENS CENTER: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Briar Hollow Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Briar Hollow Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$573k · 33 repeat orgs$72k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
18

Total granted

$573k
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+23%

Still filing today

45%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    Texas Children's Hospital
    5× · 2018–2025 · $36k · revenue +83%
  • WM
    William Marsh Rice University
    6× · 2020–2025 · $26k · revenue +68%
  • TM
    THE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $25k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • HM
    HOUSTON METHODIST HOPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • HF
    HSPVA FRIENDS CAPITAL CAMPAIGN
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • HP
    HUNT PRESERVATION SOCIETY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue ×19 · 61% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment
2
Memorial Hermann Medical Group

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
3
Mhs Physicians of Texas

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
4
Trees for Houston

Plant, protect and promote trees all over the greater Houston area.

—
5
The Hospice at the Texas Medical Center

The Hospice at the Texas Medical Center holds a freestanding 37 bed inpatient facility in the Texas Medical Center that is operated and managed by Houston Hospice.

Human Services
6
Memorial Hermann Health System

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
7
Harris County Medical Society

Our mission is to be the leading advocate for our member physicians, their patients and our community, in promoting the highest standards of ethical medical practice, access to quality medical care, medical education, research, and…

—
8
American Leadership Forum Houston Gulf Coast Chapter

American Leadership Forum (ALF) brings together, in classes, leaders with diverse perspectives so they can build relationships, learn to dialogue and respectfully differ, and work together for the good of our community.

—
9
The Methodist Hospital

To provide high quality, cost-effective health care that delivers the best value to the people we serve in a spiritual environment of caring in association with internationally recognized teaching and research.

Health
10
Houston Museum of Natural Science

The mission of the Houston Museum of Natural Science shall be to preserve and advance the general knowledge of natural science; to enhance in individuals the knowledge of and delight in natural science and related subjects; and to maintain…

Arts & Culture
11
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
12
Houston Association of Realtors

Trade association for real estate agents and brokers. provide education and training for members. promote services provided by members to the public.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Methodist Hospital Foundation; the most unlike its peers is William Marsh Rice University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
17/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARTINS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $81,100 · OtherST MARTINS EPISCOPAL CHURCHFIRST METHODIST CHURCH: $75,000 · OtherFIRST METHODIST CHURCHEPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL: $44,500 · OtherEPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOLMENNINGER: $40,000 · OtherMENNINGERTHE RISE SCHOOL OF HOUSTON: $35,000 · OtherTHE RISE SCHOOL OF HOUSTONHOUSTON METHODIST HOPITAL FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherHOUSTON METHODIST HOPITAL FOUNDATIONST MICHAELS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $15,000 · Other+29 more: $118,450 · Other+29 moreTexas Children's Hospital: $36,250 · HealthTexas Childre…THE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthTHE METHODIST…THE MENNINGER CLINIC: $11,500 · HealthTHE MENNINGER…Mental Health America of Greater Houston Inc: $3,211 · Health+2 more: $2,500 · HealthFriends of Pumpkin Park: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsFriends o…HUNT PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsHUNT PRES…William Marsh Rice University: $25,500 · EducationRANDOLPH COLLEGE INC: $5,000 · EducationBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $3,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationRIVER OAKS FOUNDATION: $15,750 · Community ImprovementThe Junior League of Houston Inc: $3,000 · Community ImprovementDEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER: $11,000 · Human ServicesPathways for Little Feet: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE 100 CLUB INC: $7,000 · Crime & LegalLONE STAR LEGAL AID: $2,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$434,050Health$78,461Recreation & Sports$55,000Education$34,500Community Improvement$18,750Human Services$16,000Crime & Legal$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFriends of Pumpkin Park: $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital: $36,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University: $25,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRIVER OAKS FOUNDATION: $15,750 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetREMIND: $14,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MENNINGER CLINIC: $11,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE 100 CLUB INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetRiver Oaks Garden Club: $5,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetRANDOLPH COLLEGE INC: $5,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHUNT PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 61% of budgetPathways for Little Feet: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMental Health America of Greater Houston Inc: $3,211 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Junior League of Houston Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHETA CHARITY EVENTS INC: $2,500 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetLONE STAR LEGAL AID: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S FUND INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLEGACY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEX-STUDENTS' ASSOCIATION OF UT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHouston Hospice: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetForum of Civics Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOUTREACH CENTER OF WEST HOUSTON INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Friends of Pumpkin Park ↗
  • Who funds Texas Children's Hospital ↗
  • Who funds William Marsh Rice University ↗
  • Who funds THE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RIVER OAKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds REMIND ↗
  • Who funds THE MENNINGER CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds DEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE 100 CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds River Oaks Garden Club ↗
  • Who funds RANDOLPH COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNT PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Pathways for Little Feet ↗
  • Who funds Mental Health America of Greater Houston Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Junior League of Houston Inc ↗
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THETA CHARITY EVENTS INC ↗
  • Who funds LONE STAR LEGAL AID ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Community FoundationTX33.1× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · The Brown Foundation Inc · Vivian L Smith Foundation · The Crain Foundation · The Elkins Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Judith and Henry Sauer Charitable Foundation · Greentree Fund · Brazelton Family Foundation · The John M O'Quinn Foundation · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · The Daniel P & Annette B Gordon Foundati

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Briar Hollow Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Briar Hollow Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Briar Hollow Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Briar Hollow Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Briar Hollow’s filings →

    More from the funding graph