Skip to content

· Public charity

Brewster Lodge 1102 Loyal Order of Moose

The Organization unites its members in the bonds of fraternity,benevolence and charity.

$223k
Granted FY2026still arriving
11
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$263kAnimals$75kPublic Safety & Disaster$49kArts & Culture$25kEducation$15kReligion$13kYouth Development$7k
02FY2026 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $197,918, the rows itemized in this filing. The $223,269 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $25,351 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k7 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $87k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$7,917
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAIRLESS ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB$55,416
OHIO STATE MOOSE MUSEUM INC$47,500
FAIRLESS LINEBACKERS INC$23,750
BREWSTER FIREMAN'S ASSOCIATION$15,833
LIFEWISE INC$7,917
FALCON BASEBALL AND SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION$7,917
THE LEGACY PROJECT OF STARK$7,917
FAIRLESS ALUMNI ASSCOCIATION$7,917
FAIRLESS MUSIC BOOSTER ASSOCIATION$7,917
FAIRLESS SOCCER CLUB$7,917
FAIRLESS YOUTH SPORTS$7,917
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 77% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OHIO STATE MOOSE MUSEUM INC: $48k → 10%FAIRLESS ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB: $61k → 13%LIFEWISE INC: $8k → 15%OHIO STATE MOOSE ASSOCIATION MUSEUM INC: $45k → 10%Fairless Athletic Booster Club: $46k → 13%Ohio State Moose Association Museum Inc: $23k → 10%FAIRLESS ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB: $39k → 13%OSMA MUSEUM INC: $18k → 10%FAIRLESS ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB: $35k → 13%OHIO STATE MOOSE ASSOC MUSEUM INC: $7k → 10%FAIRLESS LINEBACKERS INC: $24k → 13%FAIRLESS LINEBACKERS INC: $15k → 13%FAIRLESS YOUTH ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $15k → 13%FAIRLESS ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB: $12k → 13%Fairless Linebackers Inc: $9k → 13%Fairless Youth Athletic Foundation: $9k → 13%FAIRLESS YOUTH SPORTS: $8k → 13%FAIRLESS SOCCER CLUB: $8k → 13%FAIRLESS SOCCER CLUB: $8k → 13%FAIRLESS LINEBACKERS INC: $7k → 13%FAIRLESS YOUTH ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $7k → 13%FAIRLESS ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB: $55k → 13%BREWSTER FIREMAN'S ASSOCIATION: $16k → 13%BREWSTER FIREMAN'S ASSOCIATION: $15k → 13%Brewster Fireman's Association: $14k → 13%BREWSER FIREMAN ASSOCIATION: $11k → 13%BREWSTER FIREMAN'S ASSOCIATION: $9k → 13%FAIRLESS MUSIC BOOSTER ASSOCIATION: $8k → 13%FAIRLESS ALUMNI ASSCOCIATION: $8k → 13%FALCON BASEBALL AND SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION: $8k → 13%FAIRLESS MUSIC BOOSTER ASSOCIATION: $8k → 13%FAIRLESS ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $8k → 13%FALCON BASEBALL AND SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION: $8k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$601k · 10 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2026, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$601k
$13k

Still filing today

70%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyMembership BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FA
    Fairless Athletic Booster Club Inc
    6× · 2021–2026 · $247k · revenue +81% · 72% of their budget
  • OS
    OHIO STATE MOOSE ASSOCIATION MUSEUM INC
    5× · 2022–2026 · $141k · revenue +268%
  • FL
    FAIRLESS LINEBACKERS INC
    4× · 2023–2026 · $55k

Funded once

  • MO
    MISC ORGANIZED CHARITES UNDER 5000
    one grant, 2022 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fairfield Boosters

The purpose of this organization shall be to unite the parents, students, faculty, alumni, and community in the common interest of supporting and encouraging the athletic programs and related activities of the Fairfield City School…

Recreation & Sports
2
Fairfield High School Alumni Association

School and community support

Education
3
Ohio Scholastic Soccer Coaches Association

Awards to benefit boys/girls high school soccer players in ohio

Youth Development
4
Fairfield Trojans Athletic Boosters

Support of local school district's athletic programs

Education
5
Clinton-Massie Athletics Boosters
Youth Development
6
East Muskingum Student Endowment Fu
—
7
Teays Valley Music Boosters

To support the teays valley local school districts bank program

—
8
Fairmont Heights Football Alumni Association

Educating student athletes and students about healthy lifestyles that can be achieved through sports and academic program while fostering community relations

Youth Development
9
Barberton Moose Charity and Scholarship Fund Inc
Unclassified
10
Strongsville Schools Instrumental Music Boosters

Support high school instrumental music

Arts & Culture
11
Fairfield Union Athletic Boosters Club

To support athletic programs of Fairfield Union High School and Middle School

Education
12
Lake Flyers Athletic Boosters

Lake Flyers Athletic Boosters mission is to assist, support and raise funding for student athletes and for the athletic programs of Lake High School, Lake Local School District and the community at-large.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fairless Music Booster Association; the most unlike its peers is The Legacy Project of Stark. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Fairless Athletic Booster Club Inc: $247,477 · PhilanthropyFairless Athletic Booster Club IncBREWSTER FIREMEN'S ASSOCIATION INC: $48,730 · OtherBREWSTER FIREMEN'S ASSOCI…FAIRLESS YOUTH ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $31,454 · OtherFAIRLESS YOUTH ATHLETIC F…BREWSTER FIREMAN'S ASSOCIATION: $15,833 · OtherBREWSTER FIREMAN'S ASSOCI…FALCON BASEBALL AND SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION: $15,498 · OtherFALCON BASEBALL AND SOFTB…FAIRLESS SOCCOR CLUB: $15,498 · OtherFAIRLESS SOCCOR CLUBMISC ORGANIZED CHARITES UNDER 5000: $13,085 · OtherMISC ORGANIZED CHARITES U…FAIRLESS YOUTH SPORTS: $7,917 · OtherFAIRLESS YOUTH SPORTSOHIO STATE MOOSE ASSOCIATION MUSEUM INC: $140,520 · Membership BenefitOHIO STATE MOOSE ASSOCIA…FAIRLESS LINEBACKERS INC: $55,204 · Youth DevelopmentFAIRLESS LI…LIFEWISE INC: $7,917 · Youth DevelopmentLIFEWISE IN…FAIRLESS MUSIC BOOSTER ASSOCIATION: $15,498 · EducationFAIRLESS ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC: $15,498 · EducationTHE LEGACY PROJECT OF STARK: $15,498 · Education
Philanthropy$247,477Other$148,015Membership Benefit$140,520Youth Development$63,121Education$46,494

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFairless Athletic Booster Club Inc: $247,477 over 6y, 72% of budgetOHIO STATE MOOSE ASSOCIATION MUSEUM INC: $140,520 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetFAIRLESS LINEBACKERS INC: $55,204 over 4y, 14% of budgetBREWSTER FIREMEN'S ASSOCIATION INC: $48,730 over 4y, 25% of budgetFAIRLESS MUSIC BOOSTER ASSOCIATION: $15,498 over 2y, 13% of budgetFAIRLESS ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC: $15,498 over 2y, 13% of budgetTHE LEGACY PROJECT OF STARK: $15,498 over 2y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Fairless Athletic Booster Club Inc ↗
  • Who funds OHIO STATE MOOSE ASSOCIATION MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds FAIRLESS LINEBACKERS INC ↗
  • Who funds BREWSTER FIREMEN'S ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FAIRLESS MUSIC BOOSTER ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FAIRLESS ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LEGACY PROJECT OF STARK ↗
  • Who funds LIFEWISE INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brewster Lodge 1102 Loyal Order of Moose funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brewster Lodge 1102 Loyal Order of Moose. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Brewster Lodge 1102 Loyal Order of Moose?

    Find your warmest path to Brewster Lodge 1102 Loyal Order of Moose through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Brewster Lodge 1102 Loyal Order of Moose’s filings →

    More from the funding graph