How much did BRENT TAYLOR PERPETUAL CHAR TRUST grant in FY2017?

BRENT TAYLOR PERPETUAL CHAR TRUST reported 74 grants totaling $73,500 in its FY2017 IRS filing.

Where is BRENT TAYLOR PERPETUAL CHAR TRUST based?

BRENT TAYLOR PERPETUAL CHAR TRUST is based in IL.

BRENT TAYLOR PERPETUAL CHAR TRUST

Foundation Dossiers

· Private foundation

BRENT TAYLOR PERPETUAL CHAR TRUST

This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.

$74k

Granted FY2017

Grants

Communities

$1k

Largest

01What you fund

01FY2017 · 74 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000

Median grant

States reached

Total assets

Largest grants

HANNIBAL LAGRANGE COLLEGE$1,000
NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY$1,000
COLUMBIA COLLEGE$1,000
HIGHLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE$1,000
QUINCY UNIVERSITY$1,000
TRUMAN STATE UNIVERSITY$1,000
CROWDER COLLEGE$1,000
GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY$1,000
INDIANA UNIVERSITY (COLLEGE OF OPTO$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAVEN$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF AKRON$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO$1,000
COLORADO NORTHWESTERN COMMUNITY COL$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA$1,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–17) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 11%. 76% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Lincoln Memorial University

Lincoln memorial university is a values-based learning community dedicated to providing educational experiences in the liberal arts and professional studies.

Education

Upper Iowa University

Upper iowa university provides quality educational opportunities accessible through varied delivery methods to inspire success and empower lives.

Education

Midwestern University

Midwestern university dedicates the institution and its resources to the highest standards of academic excellence to meet the educational needs of the health care community.

Education

North Central University

To train and prepare leaders to serve their community, church, and world according to their vocation and gifts.

Education

Union College

Offer a college experience including education, housing, & associated programs in lincoln, ne.

Education

Union College

Union college is a private liberal arts college affiliated with the united methodist church

Education

Union University

Union University provides Christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education

St Louis University

To seek excellence in teaching, research, health care, and service to the community as guided by the spiritual and intellectual ideals of the society of jesus.

Education

Kansas City University

Kcu is a community of professionals committed to excellence in the education of highly qualified students in osteopathic medicine, dental medicine and health professions.

Education

Washington University

The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)

Education

Northcentral University

The organization is a post-secondary level educational institution.

—

Augsburg University

A private lutheran four-year university located in downtown minneapolis.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Ambrose University and the most unlike its peers is Seton Hall University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 80 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

3%1/30

the rest of the field

11%

206,163/1,819,535

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

28 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

26/28

Grantees still filing

17/28

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$50,000Education$23,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ibm International FoundationNY21.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ibm International Foundation · Culver's Foundation Inc · Griffin Family Foundation Inc · Pella Rolscreen Foundation · Ge Foundation · Pittsfield High School Class Of · Schoon Educational Scholarship Trust · Associated Colleges of Illinois Inc · Michael & Susan Dell Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Enterprise Holdings Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation BRENT TAYLOR PERPETUAL CHAR TRUST funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: IOWA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~2 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 421224333 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on IOWA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 2 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Share of budget not derivable.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Brent Taylor Perpetual Char Trust?

Find your warmest path to Brent Taylor Perpetual Char Trust through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

BRENT TAYLOR PERPETUAL CHAR TRUST

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

28 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Brent Taylor Perpetual Char Trust?

More from the funding graph

BRENT TAYLOR PERPETUAL CHAR TRUST

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

28 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Brent Taylor Perpetual Char Trust?

More from the funding graph