Skip to content

· Public charity

Brattleboro Development Credit Corp

BRATTLEBORO DEVELOPMENT CREDIT CORPoration (bdcc), is a private, nonprofit economic development organization that serves as a catalyst for industrial and commercial growth throughout southeastern vermont, including windham county and the towns of readsboro, (see sch.

$204k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$56k
Largest
01What it funds
0172% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Community Improvement$1.2MScience & Tech$1.2MArts & Culture$649kEnvironment$239kHuman Services$224kEmployment$134kPublic Benefit$128kHousing & Shelter$128kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $147,600, the rows itemized in this filing. The $203,724 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $56,124 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $41k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $106k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHEAST VERMONT TRANSIT$56,248
SEVEDS$50,000
ETHIOPIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL$26,352
VERMONT EMPLOYEE OWNERSHIP CENTER$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%ETHIOPIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: $33k → 7%ETHIOPIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: $26k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

26%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 6 repeat orgs$3.5M to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
223

Total granted

$1.3M
$3.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-5%
0%

Still filing today

67%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementPublic BenefitHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2018–2020 · $560k
  • SV
    SOUTHEASTERN VERMONT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $475k · revenue +2% · 39% of their budget
  • SV
    SOUTHEAST VERMONT TRANSIT INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $90k · revenue -5%

Funded once

  • CT
    CHROMA TECHNOLOGY CORP
    one grant, 2018 · $600k
  • T
    TRUEXCULLINS
    one grant, 2017 · $243k
  • GR
    GREEN RIVER
    one grant, 2024 · $150k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northeast Kingdom Development Corporation

Fostering, encouraging and assisting the physical location of business enterprises within the States of Vermont and New Hampshire, and having its principal purpose be industrial and economic development of one or more political…

Employment
2
Addison County Chamber of Commerce Inc

The Addison County Chamber of Commerce mission is to enhance the economic vitality of Addison County.

—
3
Adirondack Economic Development Corp

To foster and support the growth of sustainable North Country communities through providing assistance to aspiring entrepreneurs and existing small business owners.

Community Improvement
4
Skowhegan Economic Development Corp

To foster, encourage and assist in the location, settlement or resettlement of industry and recreational, agricultural,and other business enterprises in the Town of Skowhegan and in the County of Somerset.

Community Improvement
5
Community Capital of Vermont

To help small businesses and lower income entrepreneurs prosper through the provision of flexible business financing.

Community Improvement
6
The Economic Development Corporation Serving Fresno County

To promote and maintain a strong business climate throughout the city and to foster a healthy and sustainable economy for the benefit of the entire community.

—
7
Central Vermont Chamber of Commerce Inc

Promote business opportunities

—
8
Vermont Council On Rural Development Inc

The Vermont Council on Rural Development helps Vermont citizens build prosperous and resilient communities through democratic engagement, marshalling resources, and collective action.

Community Improvement
9
Essex County Industrial Development Agency Inc

Our mission is to create a viable business atmosphere that will attract compatible and diverse sustainable economic development opportunities.

—
10
Monadnock Economic Development Corp

Promotion of business development and relocations to the monadnock region of new hampshire.

Community Improvement
11
Economic Development Corp of Shasta Co

The economic development corporation of shasta county is a 501(c)(3)public benefit corporation providing programs to create primary industry employment, resulting in higher wages and added wealth for residents of shasta county.

—
12
Belknap County Economic Development Council Inc

The mission of the council is to preserve and create employment opportunities, and provide educational and business development assistance in belknap county, new hampshire.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southeastern Vermont Economic Development Strategies Inc; the most unlike its peers is Community Asylum Seekers Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 230 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
7/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHROMA TECHNOLOGY CORP: $600,000 · OtherCHROMA TECHNOLOGY CORPIndividual grant recipient: $559,947 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTRUEXCULLINS: $242,802 · OtherTRUEXCULLINSGREEN RIVER: $150,000 · Other+187 more: $2,298,293 · Other+187 moreSOUTHEASTERN VERMONT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES INC: $475,000 · Community ImprovementSOUTHEASTERN …LAMOILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP: $31,500 · Community ImprovementLAMOILLE ECON…Springfield Regional Development Corp: $25,115 · Community Improvement+1 more: $8,000 · Community ImprovementSOUTHEAST VERMONT TRANSIT INC: $89,690 · Public BenefitETHIOPIAN COMMUNITY DEV COUNCIL INC: $59,659 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ASYLUM SEEKERS PROJECT INC: $56,000 · InternationalVermont Employee Ownership Center: $15,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT INC: $6,223 · Recreation & Sports
Other$3,851,042Community Improvement$539,615Public Benefit$89,690Human Services$59,659International$56,000Education$15,000Recreation & Sports$6,223

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHEASTERN VERMONT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES INC: $475,000 over 9y, 39% of budgetSOUTHEAST VERMONT TRANSIT INC: $89,690 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetETHIOPIAN COMMUNITY DEV COUNCIL INC: $59,659 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ASYLUM SEEKERS PROJECT INC: $56,000 over 3y, 9.0% of budgetBENNINGTON COUNTY INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION: $41,499 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetGREATER BURLINGTON INDUSTRIAL CORP: $38,650 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetGreen Mountain Economic Development Corp: $31,500 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetLAMOILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP: $31,500 over 1y, 12% of budgetSpringfield Regional Development Corp: $25,115 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetCENTRAL VERMONT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP: $19,610 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetRUTLAND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP: $19,489 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetAddison County Economic Development Corporation: $16,500 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetVermont Employee Ownership Center: $15,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetFranklin County Industrial Development Corporation: $9,026 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOLD SCHOOL ENRICHMENT COUNCIL INC: $8,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT INC: $6,223 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHEASTERN VERMONT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEAST VERMONT TRANSIT INC ↗
  • Who funds ETHIOPIAN COMMUNITY DEV COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ASYLUM SEEKERS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds BENNINGTON COUNTY INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BURLINGTON INDUSTRIAL CORP ↗
  • Who funds Green Mountain Economic Development Corp ↗
  • Who funds LAMOILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
  • Who funds ALUMNAE CORP ALPHA IOTA CHAPTER ↗
  • Who funds Springfield Regional Development Corp ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL VERMONT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
  • Who funds RUTLAND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
  • Who funds Addison County Economic Development Corporation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Vermont Community FoundationVT17× affinity7 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · Thomas Thompson Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Brattleboro Development Credit Corp funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Brattleboro Development Credit Corp. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 61%
  • Bennington County Industrial Corporation: 100% of income from government
  • Addison County Economic Development Corporation: 79% of income from government
  • Lamoille Economic Development Corp: 69% of income from government
  • Springfield Regional Development Corp: 68% of income from government
  • Southeast Vermont Transit Inc: 61% of income from government
  • Green Mountain Economic Development Corp: 34% of income from government
  • Vermont Employee Ownership Center: 31% of income from government
  • Community Development Support Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Old School Enrichment Council Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Central Vermont Economic Development Corp: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
5rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Brattleboro Development Credit Corp?

Find your warmest path to Brattleboro Development Credit Corp through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 230 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Brattleboro Development Credit’s filings →

More from the funding graph