Skip to content

· Public charity

Bpoe Carlsbad Elks Lodge #1558

B.p.o.e.

$95k
Granted FY2026still arriving
5
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Philanthropy$77kHealth$73kRecreation & Sports$37kHuman Services$21kReligion$6k
02FY2026 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $69,570, the rows itemized in this filing. The $94,683 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $25,113 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$12,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CARLSBAD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$19,710
NM ELKS ASSOC UNDER THE BPOE OF THE USA$16,654
CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL SCHOOL DISTRICT$12,000
ELKS NATIONAL FOUNDATION INC$11,206
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CARLSBAD$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SENM VETERANS TRANSPORTATION NETWORK: $5k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$190k · 6 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against +42% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2026, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
3

Total granted

$190k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+42%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’23’24’25’26
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS
    4× · 2023–2026 · $56k · revenue +44%
  • EN
    ELKS NATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2023–2026 · $34k · revenue +123%
  • AL
    ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CARLSBAD INC
    3× · 2023–2026 · $26k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • NE
    NM ELKS CEREBRAL PALSY COMMISSON
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
  • JC
    JAL CLUB
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • SV
    SENM VETERANS TRANSPORTATION NETWORK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
5/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS: $55,805 · OtherBENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKSCARLSBAD MUNICIPAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ATHLETICS: $28,337 · OtherCARLSBAD MUNICIPAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ATHLETICSASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CARLSBAD INC: $25,500 · OtherASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CARLSBAD INCNM ELKS CEREBRAL PALSY COMMISSION: $25,096 · OtherNM ELKS CEREBRAL PALSY COMMISSIONCARLSBAD MUNICIPAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: $21,000 · OtherCARLSBAD MUNICIPAL SCHOOL DISTRICTNM ELKS CEREBRAL PALSY COMMISSON: $8,336 · OtherJAL CLUB: $6,000 · OtherCarlsbad Community Foundation Inc: $73,847 · PhilanthropyCarlsbad Community Foundation IncELKS NATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $33,904 · PhilanthropyELKS NATIONAL FOUNDATION INCSENM VETERANS TRANSPORTATION NETWORK INC: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$170,074Philanthropy$107,751Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCarlsbad Community Foundation Inc: $73,847 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetBENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS: $55,805 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetELKS NATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $33,904 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CARLSBAD INC: $25,500 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetSENM VETERANS TRANSPORTATION NETWORK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Carlsbad Community Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds BENEVOLENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS ↗
  • Who funds ELKS NATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CARLSBAD INC ↗
  • Who funds SENM VETERANS TRANSPORTATION NETWORK INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bpoe Carlsbad Elks Lodge #1558 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bpoe Carlsbad Elks Lodge #1558. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bpoe Carlsbad Elks Lodge #1558’s filings →

    More from the funding graph