Skip to content
Bpo Elks 134 at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Bpo Elks 134

To inculcate the principles of charity, justice, brotherly love and fidelity; to recognize a belief in god; to promote the welfare and enhance the happiness of its members; to quicken the spirit of american patriotism; to cultivate good fellowship; to perpetuate itself as a fraternal organization and to provide its government, the…

$121k
Granted FY2026still arriving
12
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Health$25kHuman Services$25kRecreation & Sports$13kHousing & Shelter$6k
02FY2026 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k6 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $120k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LANCASTER COUNTY FIELD OF HOPE$25,000
BRIDLEPATH EQUINE CENTER$25,000
BRIDLEPATH EQUINE CENTER$25,000
LANCASTER COUNTY FIELD OF HOPE$25,000
LANCASTER RECREATION COMMISSION$10,000
LANCASTER RECREATION COMMISSION$10,000
BUILDING BRIDGES FOUNDATION AT ANDERSON FARM$6,866
LONE OAK ANIMAL-ASSISTED THERAPEUTIC$6,866
LONE OAK ANIMAL-ASSISTED THERAPEUTIC$6,866
BUILDING BRIDGES FOUNDATION AT ANDERSON FARM$6,866
PENNSYLVANIA ELKS MAJOR PROJECTS INC$6,000
PENNSYLVANIA ELKS MAJOR PROJECTS INC$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AARON'S ACRES: $25k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Special Equestrian Riding Therapy

Equestrian Riding Therapy

—
2
Main Stay Therapeutic Farm Inc

Main stays mission is to enrich mind, body and spirit through powerful connections with horses, animals, and nature.

Human Services
3
Main Line Adult Day Center

Main Line Adult Day Center provides day-time services to meet the needs of cognitively physically impaired adults. Services, provided in a safe, interactive supportive environment, include therapeutic recreational activities, nutrition…

—
4
Downs On the Farm

Services to individuals with developmental disabilities

Animals
5
Wild Hearts Therapeutic Equestrain Program Inc

Providing Equine Assisted Psychotherapy

Human Services
6
Hoofbeats With Heart

Dedicated to provide professional and safe therapy experiences while improving the lives of individual with disabilities and their families through therapy, recreation, education, exploration, joy and most importantly hope.

Human Services
7
Oak Manor Inc

Provide housing and support services for the mentally challenged to assist in mainstream living.

—
8
Trax Equestrian Center Inc

To offer a horseback riding program that coordinates physical and emotional therapy

Human Services
9
American Therapeutic Riding Center

The American Therapeutic Riding Center improves physically and emotionally challenged people through equine-facilitated therapy.

Human Services
10
Woodland Strides
Health
11
Veteran Equine Therapy Stables
Public Benefit
12
Bridgewood Farms Inc

Providing assistance to those with mental or physical handicaps which prevent them from living comfortably in society on their own.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Building Bridges Foundation At Anderson Farm; the most unlike its peers is Pennsylvania Elks Major Projects Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LANCASTER COUNTY FIELD OF HOPE: $50,000 · HealthLANCASTER COUNTY FIELD OF HOPEARCH STREET CENTER INC: $25,000 · HealthARCH STREET CENTER INCBUILDING BRIDGES FOUNDATION AT ANDERSON FARM: $13,732 · HealthBUILDING BRIDGES FOUNDATION AT ANDERSON FARMLONE OAK ANIMAL ASSISTED THERAPEUTIC AND EDUCATION: $13,732 · HealthLONE OAK ANIMAL ASSISTED THERAPEUTIC AND EDUCATIONPennsylvania Elks Major Projects Inc: $12,000 · HealthPennsylvania Elks Major Projects IncBridlepath Equine Center: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsBridlepath Equine CenterLANCASTER RECREATION COMMISSION: $33,200 · OtherLANCASTER RECREA…AARON'S ACRES: $25,000 · Human ServicesAARON'S ACRE…LANCASTER REDEVELOPMENT FUND: $6,000 · Community Improvement
Health$114,464Recreation & Sports$50,000Other$33,200Human Services$25,000Community Improvement$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAARON'S ACRES: $25,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetARCH STREET CENTER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Lancaster County Comm…
Lancaster County Community FoundationPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lancaster County Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bpo Elks 134 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bpo Elks 134. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bpo Elks 134’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home