Skip to content
Boyd Andrew Management Services at a glance

· Public charity

Boyd Andrew Management Services

BOYD ANDREW MANAGEMENT SERVICES provides administrative support to agencies working to improve community health and safety.

$680k
Granted FY2021
1
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$680k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Health$6.1M
02FY2021 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$680,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYD ANDREW COMMUNITY SERVICES$680,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WESTERN MONTANA ADDICTION SERVICES: $346k → 9%ALCOHOL AND DRUG SERVICES OF GALLATIN COUNTY: $57k → 10%DISTRICT II ALCOHOL AND DRUG PROGRAM: $398k → 10%SOUTHWEST CD PROGRAM: $253k → 10%EASTERN MONTANA COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER: $111k → 11%WESTERN MONTANA TRI-COUNTY ADDICTION SERVICES: $146k → 14%WHITE SKY HOPE CENTER: $123k → 18%WESTERN MONTANA ADDICTION SERVICES: $316k → 9%ALCOHOL AND DRUG SERVICES OF GALLATIN COUNTY: $56k → 10%DISTRICT II ALCOHOL AND DRUG PROGRAM: $361k → 10%SOUTHWEST CD PROGRAM: $226k → 10%EASTERN MONTANA COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER: $107k → 11%WESTERN MONTANA TRI-COUNTY ADDICTION SERVICES: $118k → 14%WHITE SKY HOPE CENTER: $102k → 18%WESTERN MONTANA ADDICTION SERVICES: $147k → 9%ALCOHOL AND DRUG SERVICES OF GALLATIN COUNTY: $25k → 10%DISTRICT II ALCOHOL AND DRUG PROGRAM: $211k → 10%SOUTHWEST CD PROGRAM: $119k → 10%EASTERN MONTANA COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER: $61k → 11%WESTERN MONTANA TRI-COUNTY ADDICTION SERVICES: $87k → 14%WHITE SKY HOPE CENTER: $56k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.1M · 9 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2021, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
0

Total granted

$6.1M
$0

Still filing today

78%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
HealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BOYD ANDREW COMMUNITY SERVICES
    2× · 2020–2021 · $1.4M · revenue +35%
  • RB
    ROCKY BOY HEALTH CENTER
    3× · 2017–2019 · $281k · revenue +95%
  • EM
    EASTERN MONTANA COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER
    3× · 2017–2019 · $279k · revenue +66%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Center for Mental Health

    The center for mental health partners with people and communities to produce exceptional mental health and substance abuse services.

    —
    2
    Addiction & Behavioral Health Center Inc

    Treatment of alcohol and drug abuse

    —
    3
    Three Rivers Mental Health & Chemical Dependency Center

    Mental Health Program

    Health
    4
    Rocky Mountain Behavioral Health Inc

    The Organization provides developed, evidence-based prevention and treatment mental health program services focused on alcohol, substance abuse, and domestic violence related issues. The Organization also provides affordable and accessible…

    —
    5
    Phoenix Counseling Center Inc

    Conducted drug and alcohol counseling programs serving Southern Oregon including court-mandated DUI programs.

    Health
    6
    Alcohol & Drug Dependency Services of Southeast Iowa

    Substance abuse treatment and prevention.

    Health
    7
    North Range Behavioral Health

    North range behavioral health is dedicated to providing professional, comprehensive mental health and substance use disorder services.

    Health
    8
    North Central Mental Health Services Inc

    To provide mental health and drug addiction services.

    Health
    9
    Mountain High Recovery Center

    Mountain High Recovery Center is a substance use treatment facility whose mission is to provide local, quality, and affordable recovery services to individuals and families in the South Lake Tahoe, CA community.

    Health
    10
    Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment Center

    To operate one or more drug treatment centers for the detoxifation and rehabilitation of male and female addicts in region m-5 in the state of alabama as defined by the alabama community of mental healthfacilities plan.

    Health
    11
    D & a Detox Center Inc

    Drug and alcohol rehabilition in a clean and sober living environment. provide medically supervised detoxification services for addicts

    —
    12
    Marshall-Jackson Mental Health Board Inc

    To promote the health and general welfare of the citizens of marshall and jackson counties and other board approved geographic areas and services by providing a comprehensive program of community based mental health services and facilities…

    Health
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is South Central Montana Regional Mental Health Center; the most unlike its peers is Southwest Chemical Dependency. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    1
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/9
    Grantees still filing
    4/9
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    WESTERN MONTANA MENTAL HEALTH CENTER: $1,159,548 · OtherWESTERN MONTANA MENTAL HEALTH CENTERDISTRICT II ALCOHOL & DRUG: $970,482 · OtherDISTRICT II ALCOHOL & DRUGFLATHEAD VALLEY CHEMICAL DEPENDENCY CLINIC INC: $512,663 · OtherFLATHEAD VALLEY CHEMICAL DEPENDENCY CLINIC INCSOUTH CENTRAL MONTANA REGIONAL MENTAL HEALTH CENTER: $276,404 · OtherSOUTH CENTRAL MONTANA REGIONAL MENTAL HEALTH CENTERAlcohol and Drug Services of Gallatin County: $136,953 · OtherSOUTHWEST CHEMICAL DEPENDENCY: $1,079,183 · HealthSOUTHWEST CHEMICAL DEPENDENCYROCKY BOY HEALTH CENTER: $281,280 · HealthROCKY BOY HEALTH CENTEREASTERN MONTANA COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER: $279,173 · HealthEASTERN MONTANA COMMUNITY MENT…BOYD ANDREW COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1,395,000 · Crime & LegalBOYD ANDREW COMMUNITY SER…
    Other$3,056,050Health$1,639,636Crime & Legal$1,395,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYD ANDREW COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1,395,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetWESTERN MONTANA MENTAL HEALTH CENTER: $1,159,548 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetDISTRICT II ALCOHOL & DRUG: $970,482 over 3y, 51% of budgetFLATHEAD VALLEY CHEMICAL DEPENDENCY CLINIC INC: $512,663 over 3y, 18% of budgetROCKY BOY HEALTH CENTER: $281,280 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetEASTERN MONTANA COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER: $279,173 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetSOUTH CENTRAL MONTANA REGIONAL MENTAL HEALTH CENTER: $276,404 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetAlcohol and Drug Services of Gallatin County: $136,953 over 3y, 5.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Boyd Andrew Management Services funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Boyd Andrew Management Services. Bigger dots raise more.

    2023
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Boyd Andrew Management Services?

      Find your warmest path to Boyd Andrew Management Services through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Boyd Andrew Management Services’ filings →

      More from the funding graph

      The unnamed billions
      grants reported with no recipient in the public record
      The regranting layer
      51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
      The DAF merry-go-round
      $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
      The endowment market
      who holds foundation money, and what just moved
      The camps
      funders cluster by geography, not ideology
      By state
      where grant money is based, and what stays home