Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Borracho Pescador

The organization's primary mission is to provide funds for research in finding a cure for various debilitating disorders.

$364k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$130k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Health$1.2MHuman Services$34k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $99k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $260k
$34,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$24k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL RETT SYNDROME FOUNDATION$130,000
TEXAS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$130,000
HOPE ROAD CENTER INC$34,000
THE TWIN TO TWIN TRANSFUSION SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC$32,500
THE MARFAN FOUNDATION INC$32,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOPE ROAD CENTER INC: $34k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 4 repeat orgs$92k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
2

Total granted

$1.1M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+27%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $67k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IR
    International Rett Syndrome Foundation
    5× · 2021–2025 · $478k · revenue +17%
  • TC
    Texas Children's Hospital
    5× · 2021–2025 · $478k · revenue +40%
  • TM
    THE MARFAN FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $89k · revenue -5%

Funded once

  • DS
    DOWN SYNDROME PARTNERSHIP OF NORTH TEXASgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +27%
  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Crush Rett Syndrome

Raise Awareness/Fund Finding a Cure for Rett Syndrome

Health
2
Rothmund-Thomson Syndrome Foundation

Foster worldwide awareness and education about RTS and related disorders and to encourage research through support of scientists and physicians devoted to studying the clinical spectrum, molecular and cellular basis of RECQL4 and related…

Health
3
Cure Tay-Sachs Foundation

The cure tay-sachs foundation has been created to fund the research initiatives that show promise to treat and ultimately cure tay-sachs disease (tsd). tsd is hereditary disease passed on when two carrier parents both pass the tay-sachs…

Health
4
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
5
PACS1 Syndrome Research Foundation
Health
6
Ataxia Telangiectasia Children's Project Inc

Ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) is a genetic disease that causes loss of muscle control and balance, cancer, lung disease, and immune system problems in children and young adults, shortening their lives. The nonprofit A-T Children's Project…

Science & Tech
7
The Blue Bird Circle

The Blue Bird Circle (the Circle) is dedicated to the promotion of the well-being of humanity through the betterment of the community. Its charitable and benevolent activities are pledged to the support of The Blue Bird Circle Clinic for…

Health
8
Dup 15Q Alliance

Dup15q alliance empowers individuals living with dup15q syndrome and other related rare diseases to reach their full potential by advancing breakthrough research and life-changing therapeutic treatments, supporting families affected by…

Health
9
CACNA1A Foundation

To find specific treatment options and a cure for CACNA1A patients. (See Schedule O for full mission)

Health
10
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
11
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
12
Breakthrough T1D

Breakthrough t1d is the leading global t1d organization working to accelerate life-changing breakthroughs to cure, prevent, and treat t1d and its complications.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Twin to Twin Transfusion Syndrome Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Hope Road Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

International Rett Syndrome Foundation — $478,000 · HealthInternational Rett Syndrome FoundationTexas Children's Hospital — $478,000 · HealthTexas Children's HospitalCASTING 4 A CURE INC — $62,000 · HealthCASTING 4 A CURE INC+1 more — $10,000 · HealthTHE MARFAN FOUNDATION INC — $88,500 · OtherTHE MARFAN …THE TWIN TO TWIN TRANSFUSION SYNDROME FOUNDATION — $32,500 · OtherTHE TWIN TO…HOPE ROAD CENTER INC — $34,000 · Human ServicesDOWN SYNDROME PARTNERSHIP OF NORTH TEXAS — $15,000 · Human Services
Health$1,028,000Other$121,000Human Services$49,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetInternational Rett Syndrome Foundation — $478,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital — $478,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARFAN FOUNDATION INC — $88,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCASTING 4 A CURE INC — $62,000 over 3y, 26% of budgetHOPE ROAD CENTER INC — $34,000 over 1y, 46% of budgetTHE TWIN TO TWIN TRANSFUSION SYNDROME FOUNDATION — $32,500 over 1y, 20% of budgetDOWN SYNDROME PARTNERSHIP OF NORTH TEXAS — $15,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Borracho Pescador funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Borracho Pescador?

    Find your warmest path to Borracho Pescador through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph