Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Borglum Gloria Charitable Tr Irrev

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$125k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$313kAnimals$305kHealth$214kEducation$104kPublic Safety & Disaster$104kPhilanthropy$3k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$12,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOUNT RUSHMORE NATIONAL MEMORIAL SOC$37,500
THE MAXFUND INC$18,750
DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE$18,750
GUIDE DOG FDN FOR THE BLIND INC$12,500
ALLIANCE FOR EPILEPSY RESEARCH$12,500
THE AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$12,500
KAPPA ALPHA THETA FOUNDATION$12,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $104k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $14k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $14k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $14k → 14%THE AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $13k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $12k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $12k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $9k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.0M · 8 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
1

Total granted

$1.0M
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+346%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MR
    MOUNT RUSHMORE NATIONAL MEMORIAL SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $313k · revenue +83%
  • TM
    THE MAXFUND INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $146k · revenue +77%
  • DD
    DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $144k · revenue +254%

Funded once

  • MF
    MAX FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +346% · 38% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nestle Purina Petcare Company Trust Fund
2
Pet's Miracle Network Inc
Animals
3
America's Vetdogs the Veterans K-9 Corps Inc

To assist disabled veterans, active military personnel, first responders with disabilities, and those who have served our country honorably to live with dignity and independence. america's vetdogs trains and places guide dogs for…

Public Benefit
4
No Dogs Left Behind
Animals
5
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
6
Big Dog Rescue Inc co James & Cheryl Babcock
7
Original Dogs Corp
Public Benefit
8
The Adoptable Dog
Animals
9
Furever Match Inc
10
Asian Dogs Rescue Allies

To rescue at risk k-9s from asia.

Animals
11
Pet Helpers
Animals
12
Dogs Unbroken

Dog Rescue Dogs Unbroken supports Colorado dogs at higher risk for euthanasia evaluating their behavioral stability and applying training methods appropriate for their needs. The goal of helping each dog learn to make good choices in…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Dumb Friends League and the most unlike its peers is Max Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MOUNT RUSHMORE NATIONAL MEMORIAL SOCIETY — $313,188 · OtherMOUNT RUSHMORE NATIONAL MEMORIAL SOCIETYGUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC — $109,396 · OtherGUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INCALLIANCE FOR EPILEPSY RESEARCH — $104,396 · OtherALLIANCE FOR EPILEPSY RESEARCH+2 more — $18,896 · OtherTHE MAXFUND INC — $145,646 · AnimalsTHE MAXFUND INCDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE — $143,646 · AnimalsDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUEKAPPA ALPHA THETA FOUNDATION INC — $104,396 · EducationKAPPA ALPHA…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $104,396 · Human ServicesAmerican Na…
Other$545,876Animals$289,292Education$104,396Human Services$104,396

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMOUNT RUSHMORE NATIONAL MEMORIAL SOCIETY — $313,188 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetTHE MAXFUND INC — $145,646 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE — $143,646 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC — $109,396 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetKAPPA ALPHA THETA FOUNDATION INC — $104,396 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $104,396 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPetaid Colorado — $15,896 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMAX FUND INC — $3,000 over 1y, 38% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MOUNT RUSHMORE NATIONAL MEMORIAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds THE MAXFUND INC
  • Who funds DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE
  • Who funds GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC
  • Who funds KAPPA ALPHA THETA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds Petaid Colorado
  • Who funds MAX FUND INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Borglum Gloria Charitable Tr Irrev funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph