Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bonnie Ruff Scholarship Fund Xxx-Xx-Xxxx

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$24k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$146k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$4,250
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA$10,250
PURDUE UNIVERSITY$4,250
INDIANA UNIVERSITY$4,250
MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE$1,750
EVANSVILLE LUTHERAN SCHOOL$1,119
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 75% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY NEBRASKA: $4k → 8%UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY: $1k → 14%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY WISCONSIN: $7k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA: $7k → 15%INDIANA UNIVERSITY-PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 16%INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $3k → 18%ISU OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER: $2k → 19%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 19%KENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $3k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE: $2k → 15%WESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $1k → 18%MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 19%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY WISCONSIN: $6k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA: $5k → 15%INDIANA UNIVERSITY-PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 16%INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $2k → 18%ISU OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER: $1k → 19%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 19%KENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $2k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE: $1k → 15%WESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $850 → 18%MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 19%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $500 → 11%CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY WISCONSIN: $3k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA: $4k → 15%INDIANA UNIVERSITY-PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $935 → 16%INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $2k → 18%INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $750 → 19%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE: $750 → 15%WESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $750 → 18%MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 19%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $500 → 11%CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY WISCONSIN: $2k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA: $3k → 15%INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $1k → 18%INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $750 → 19%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 19%WESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $750 → 18%EVANSVILLE LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $1k → 15%ROSE-HULMAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $2k → 19%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA: $2k → 15%BUTLER UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%ROSE-HULMAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $2k → 19%ROSE-HULMAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $1k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
WI
NY
IN
NE
MO
KY
TN
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$138k · 16 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
3

Total granted

$138k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+32%

Still filing today

31%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CU
    CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $19k · revenue +9%
  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2019–2022 · $5k · revenue +44%
  • RI
    Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
    3× · 2018–2020 · $4k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • CU
    CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY NEBRASKA
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
  • BU
    Butler Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +32%
  • US
    UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Indianapolis

The mission of the University of Indianapolis is to prepare its graduates for effective membership in the societies in which they live and serve, and for excellence and leadership in their lives.

Education
2
Indiana University Research & Technology

The indiana university research and technology corporation (iurtc) serves indiana university, the state of indiana, and the nation through creation and application of the university developed technologies and services, and the expanded…

Education
3
Illinois Institute of Technology

To provide distinctive and relevant education in an environment of scientific, technological, and professional knowledge creation and innovation.

Education
4
Upper Iowa University

Upper iowa university provides quality educational opportunities accessible through varied delivery methods to inspire success and empower lives.

Education
5
DePauw University

DePauw is a nationally-recognized, leading liberal arts college committed to creating an atmosphere of intellectual challenge & engagement that prepares students for lifelong success.

Education
6
Washington College

Washington college challenges and inspires emerging citizen leaders to discover lives of purpose and passion.

Education
7
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
8
Trine University

Trine, an internationally recognized private, independent, co-educational institution offers degrees in various programs including engineering, math, science and business.

Education
9
University of Chicago

The mission of the university of chicago has been to sustain at the highest level of excellence, the communication of knowledge, the creation of knowledge and the fostering of a dynamic community of scholars and students.

Education
10
Washington and Lee University

See schedule owashington and lee university provides a liberal arts education to approximately 1,800 undergraduate students & offers jd & llm studies to approximately 400 law students each year.

Education
11
Kansas City University

Kcu is a community of professionals committed to excellence in the education of highly qualified students in osteopathic medicine, dental medicine and health professions.

Education
12
Ohio Wesleyan University

Owu is one of the nation's premier small liberal arts colleges, boasting strong relationships between students and faculty and opportunities that prepare students for service and leadership.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Evansville; the most unlike its peers is Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
6/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA: $32,050 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANATRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $25,780 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITYIndiana University School of Medicine: $13,575 · OtherIndiana University School of MedicineMURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY: $7,220 · OtherMURRAY STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE: $6,225 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLERose-Hulman Institute of Technology: $4,275 · OtherMONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $4,275 · OtherINDIANA UNIVERSITY-PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $4,035 · OtherCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY NEBRASKA: $4,000 · Other+6 more: $12,944 · Other+6 moreCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC: $18,975 · EducationCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INCWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $4,700 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYKENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $4,200 · EducationKENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEG…UNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE: $2,100 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLEButler University: $1,500 · Education
Other$114,379Education$31,475

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC: $18,975 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $4,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRose-Hulman Institute of Technology: $4,275 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $4,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE: $2,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetButler University: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds KENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF EVANSVILLE ↗
  • Who funds Butler University ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bonnie Ruff Scholarship Fund Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bonnie Ruff Scholarship Fund Xxx-Xx-Xxxx. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bonnie Ruff Scholarship Fund Xxx-Xx-Xxxx’s filings →

    More from the funding graph