Skip to content
Bon Secours Hospital Baltimore Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Bon Secours Hospital Baltimore Inc

The mission is to provide compassionate healthcare services for all, regardless of patients' socio-economic status and ability to pay.

$285k
Granted FY2019
4
Grants FY2019
2
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Education$120kYouth Development$58kHealth$28kPhilanthropy$20kCommunity Improvement$15kCivil Rights$5kReligion$5k
02FY2019 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $42,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $284,642 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $242,142 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $33k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$76M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Cristo Rey Corp Internship Program Inc$22,500
United Way of Central Maryland$10,000
American Diabetes Association$5,000
Archdiocese of Baltimore$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%National Association of Health Service Executives: $5k → 14%American Diabetes Association: $5k → 7%Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc: $70k → 11%United Way of Central Maryland: $10k → 19%National Association of Health: $5k → 14%United Way of Central Maryland: $10k → 19%American Diabetes Association: $5k → 19%Southwest Partnership Inc: $10k → 19%Operation Win in Life CDC Inc: $8k → 19%Cristo Rey Corp Internship Program Inc: $36k → 19%Cristo Rey Corp Internship Program Inc: $23k → 19%Finn Group LLC: $5k → 19%NAACP Baltimore City Branch: $5k → 19%Coppin State University: $10k → 19%Johns Hopkins University: $40k → 19%Archdiocese of Baltimore: $5k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$98k · 4 repeat orgs$153k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2019, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
7

Total granted

$98k
$148k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+28%

Still filing today

75%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
EducationHealthPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    CRISTO REY CORPORATE INTERNSHIP PROGRAM INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $58k
  • TU
    THE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $20k · revenue +9%
  • NA
    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HEALTH SERVICES EXECUTIVES
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue +177%

Funded once

  • CR
    CAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $70k · revenue +4%
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $40k · revenue +51%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 · EducationCAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION INCJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $40,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYCRISTO REY CORPORATE INTERNSHIP PROGRAM INC: $58,000 · OtherCRISTO REY CORPORATE INTERNSHIP PROGRAM …UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK: $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARKOperation Win in Life CDC Inc: $7,500 · OtherOperation Win in Life CDC IncThe Finn Group: $5,000 · OtherThe Finn GroupNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE: $5,000 · OtherNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT…ARCHDIOCESE OF BALTIMORE CHANCERY INC: $5,000 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF BALTIMORE CHANCERY INCTHE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE UNITE…NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HEALTH SERVICES EXECUTIVES: $10,000 · HealthNATIONAL …American Diabetes Association: $10,000 · HealthAmerican …SOUTHWEST PARTNERSHIP INC: $10,000 · Community Improvement
Education$110,000Other$90,500Philanthropy$20,000Health$20,000Community Improvement$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCRISTO REY CORPORATE INTERNSHIP PROGRAM INC: $58,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HEALTH SERVICES EXECUTIVES: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSOUTHWEST PARTNERSHIP INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bon Secours Hospital Baltimore Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bon Secours Hospital Baltimore Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Southwest Partnership Inc: 57% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 13% of income from government
  • Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc: 3% of income from government
  • The United Way of Central Maryland Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bon Secours Hospital Baltimore’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home