Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bnei Mordechai Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$12k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Civil Rights$63kReligion$27kHuman Services$8kPhilanthropy$600Education$160
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $2k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,206
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION KEREN HATORAH$10,000
CONGREGATION VYOEL MOSHE D'SATMAR$1,206
AHAVAS TZEDAKA V'CHESED$1,000
CONGREGATION YETEV LEV OF MONSEY$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 1% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%CONG TIFERES YISROEL: $34k → 14%AHAVAS TZEDAKA V'CHESED: $1k → 20%CONG SATMAR LAKEWOOD: $10k → 11%UNITED TALMUDICAL ACADEMY: $11k → 14%CONGREGATION KEREN HATORAH: $10k → 14%KOLLEL ZICHRON: $7k → 14%CONG VYOEL MOSHE DSAMAR: $2k → 14%CONGREGATION VYOEL MOSHE D'SATMAR: $1k → 14%CONG AHAVAS ZEDOKE VCHESED: $1k → 14%CONG ZICHRON YAAKOV: $740 → 14%CHEVRE OSE ZEDAKA: $500 → 14%KOLLEL ZICHRON MENACHEM: $500 → 14%KOLLEL ZICHRON SHNEUR: $250 → 14%KOLLEL AVREICHIM OF UTA: $250 → 14%BAIS ROCHEL SCHOOL: $160 → 14%CONGREGATION YETEV LEV OF MONSEY: $100 → 14%BETH MEDRASH ELYON: $50 → 14%CONG TIFERES YISROEL: $10k → 14%CONG TIFERES YISROEL: $6k → 14%CONG TIFERES YISROEL: $3k → 14%GOLDSTEIN MEMORIAL FUND: $600 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $53,145 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNITED TALMUDICAL ACADEMY — $10,500 · OtherUNITED TALMUDICAL ACADEMYIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONGREGATION KEREN HATORAH INC — $10,000 · OtherCONGREGATION KEREN HATORAH INCIndividual grant recipient — $7,260 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+13 more — $8,286 · Other+13 more
Other$99,191

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

The Ojc FundNY12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bnei Mordechai Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Bnei Mordechai Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph