· Public charity
Bmh Inc
Bingham memorial hospital is committed to the pursuit of excellence in its endeavor to provide a continuum of quality, compassionate healthcare services for our residents and for visitors to bingham county, in the most effective and cost effective manner possible.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $199,900 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $271,007 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $71,107 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $122k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| IE PRODUCTIONS | $55,000 |
| BENGAL SPORTS PROPERTIES | $48,000 |
| EASTERN IDAHO STATE FAIR | $27,000 |
| IDAHO FALLS AUDITORIUM DISTRICT | $20,000 |
| IDAHO FALLS CHUKARS BASEBALL | $17,000 |
| KBTK EVENTS LLC | $10,000 |
| JUNIPER HILLS COUNTRY CLUB | $9,400 |
| GEM STATE CLASSIC PRO RODEO | $7,500 |
| SE IDAHO YOUTH FOOTBALL LEAGUE | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +129% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LILearfield IMG College7× · 2018–2024 · $420k
- ISIdaho State University Foundation Inc4× · 2017–2021 · $252k · revenue +129%
- EIEASTERN IDAHO DISTRICT FAIR5× · 2018–2024 · $158k
Funded once
- EIEAST IDAHO HOCKEY INCone grant, 2023 · $87k
- ISIDAHO STATE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2018 · $25k
- JFJRM FOUNDATION FOR HUMANITY INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $13k · revenue +37%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Idaho Wildlife Federation (IWF) promotes the conservation of Idaho's wildlife heritage and legacy of sporting opportunities for the current and future generations.
To support the education, health, and welfare of all children and youth.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Idaho Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Southeast Idaho Little League Football Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Idaho State University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds JRM FOUNDATION FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds IDAHO HEART FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds IDAHO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KIND COMMUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds Alturas International Academy Inc ↗
- Who funds BLACKFOOT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST IDAHO LITTLE LEAGUE FOOTBALL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bmh Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.