Skip to content

· Private foundation

Blt Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$130k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Civil Rights$366kEnvironment$135kHealth$118kInternational$67kCrime & Legal$63kPublic Benefit$50kHousing & Shelter$30kHuman Services$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$25,000
LEGAL COUNSEL FOR YOUTH AND CHILDRE$15,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$15,000
TRANS YOUTH EMERGENCY PROJECT$15,000
CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB$15,000
UPWARD BOUND HOUSE DEV DEPT$15,000
350ORG$10,000
BRENNAN CENTER$10,000
ACLU FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB: $15k → 9%CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB: $15k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
NY
MA
CA
NC
DC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$945k · 24 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
1

Total granted

$945k
$10k

Still filing today

54%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Civil RightsInternationalCrime & LegalEnvironmentHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NI
    NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT
    6× · 2018–2023 · $68k · revenue +81%
  • MADRE INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $67k · revenue +39%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $63k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • WT
    WASHINGTON THERAPY FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The International Institute On Race Equality and Human Rights

The international institute on race, equality and human rights contributes to the promotion and defense of human rights, through training, technical assistance, advocacy, and strategic litigation conducted at the regional and international…

International
2
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
3
Southern Coalition for Social Justice

Southern coalition for social justice partners with communities of color and economically disadvantaged communities across the south to defend and advance their political, social, and economic rights. through an intersectional and…

Crime & Legal
4
American Civil Liberties Union of Texas Inc

The ACLU of Texas works with communities, at the State Capitol, and in the courts to protect and advance civil rights and civil liberties for every Texan, no exceptions.

—
5
Equal Justice Center

The Equal Justice Center is a non-profit law firm and employment justice organization which empowers low-income families, workers, and communities to achieve fair treatment in the workplace, in the justice system, and in our shared society…

Civil Rights
6
Indigenous Peoples Rights Inc

To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.

Human Services
7
Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area

As one of the most enduring civil rights institutions on the West Coast, we work to dismantle systems of oppression and racism, and build an equitable and just society.

—
8
American Civil Liberties Union of Washington Found

To protect and extend civil liberties and civil rights, and to take action to further those liberties and rights within the state of washington.

Civil Rights
9
Equality Now Inc

To achieve legal and systematic change that addresses violence and discrimination against women and girls around the world.

International
10
Aclu Foundation of Texas Inc

The ACLU Foundation of Texas is the unyielding guardian and promoter of freedom, justice, equality and dignity of all people, particularly for those who are still fighting to secure the full exercise of their civil rights and liberties.…

Civil Rights
11
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
12
Civil Liberties Defense Center

CIVIL LIBERTIES DEFENSE CENTER (CLDC) educates the general public about their rights and privileges under the US Constitution and provides free legal support to climate and social justice activists.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Immigrant Rights Project; the most unlike its peers is Indigenous Environmental Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRENNAN CENTER: $75,000 · OtherBRENNAN CENTERNORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT: $68,000 · OtherNORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECTACLU: $55,000 · OtherACLUPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $45,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT - NATL GUILD: $34,000 · OtherNATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT - NATL GUILDUPWARD BOUND HOUSE DEV DEPT: $30,000 · OtherUPWARD BOUND HOUSE DEV DEPTOUTRIGHT: $26,000 · OtherOUTRIGHTTRANS YOUTH EMERGENCY PROJECT: $25,000 · OtherTRANS YOUTH EMERGENCY PROJECTLAMBDA: $25,000 · OtherLAMBDA+3 more: $33,000 · Other+3 moreFair Elections Center: $50,000 · Civil RightsFair Elections C…SOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC: $30,000 · Civil RightsSOUTHERNERS ON N…EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $25,000 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE IN…AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL L…CULTURAL SURVIVAL INC: $15,000 · Civil RightsCULTURAL SURVIVA…350ORG: $110,000 · Environment350ORGMADRE INC: $67,000 · InternationalMADRE INCGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $14,000 · InternationalGLOBAL FU…SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $55,000 · Crime & LegalLEGAL COUNSEL FOR YOUTH AND CHILDREN: $15,000 · Crime & LegalPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $63,000 · HealthCHIEF SEATTLE CLUB: $30,000 · Human ServicesINDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK: $25,000 · Education
Other$451,000Civil Rights$140,000Environment$110,000International$81,000Crime & Legal$70,000Health$63,000Human Services$30,000Education$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget350ORG: $110,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT: $68,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMADRE INC: $67,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $63,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $55,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFair Elections Center: $50,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCHIEF SEATTLE CLUB: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK: $25,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCULTURAL SURVIVAL INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $14,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds 350ORG ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds MADRE INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Fair Elections Center ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds INDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CULTURAL SURVIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL COUNSEL FOR YOUTH AND CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Blt Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Blt Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Blt Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Blt Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Blt’s filings →

    More from the funding graph