Skip to content
Bloome Family Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Bloome Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$220k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Civil Rights$375kInternational$175kArts & Culture$95kReligion$60k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $170k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
American Jewish Committee$50,000
Hillel at the University of Washington$30,000
Israel on Campus Coalition$25,000
Holocaust Center for Humanity$25,000
Anti-Defamation League Foundation$25,000
Israel Emergency Alliance$25,000
Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in$10,000
US Holocaust Memorial Museum$10,000
HonestReporting$10,000
Foundation to Combat Antisemitism (FCAS)$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 72% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Foundation to Combat Antisemitism (FCAS): $10k → 7%Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in: $25k → 16%American Friends of Magen David Adom: $10k → 17%US Holocaust Memorial Museum: $10k → 14%Holocaust Center for Humanity: $25k → 9%Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in: $25k → 16%American Friends of Magen David Adom: $10k → 17%Israel on Campus Coalition: $25k → 14%Holocaust Center for Humanity: $25k → 9%Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in: $10k → 16%American Jewish Committee: $50k → 17%Israel on Campus Coalition: $25k → 14%Holocaust Center for Humanity: $25k → 9%Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in: $10k → 16%American Jewish Committee: $50k → 17%Israel on Campus Coalition: $15k → 14%Hillel at the University of Washington: $30k → 9%American Jewish Committee: $50k → 17%Hillel at the University of Washington: $30k → 9%American Jewish Committee: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$675k · 8 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

$675k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
0%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Civil RightsInternationalArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $200k · revenue +86%
  • ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $100k · revenue +55%
  • IE
    ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $85k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • FT
    FOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2025 · $10k · revenue ×52
  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
    one grant, 2025 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • HI
    HONESTREPORTINGCOM INC
    one grant, 2025 · $10k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alliance for Israel

To educate about antisemitism and the campaign to boycott, divest from and sanction Israel.

Civil Rights
2
Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida
—
3
The Jerusalem Connection
—
4
Voices United for Israel

Educational information regarding Israel and the Middle East.

International
5
University of Judaism Foundation
—
6
Moskowitz Prize for Zionism Inc
—
7
Israel 21c

Through its news service and public programs, Israel 21c educates individuals and groups about comtemporary life in Israel providing news and information on the people of Israel, its culture and business and scientific achievements.

Education
8
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Aishel Hatzedek
International
10
National Council of Jewish Women Inc Jersey Hills Section
—
11
Novachai
Education
12
Sherit Isroel
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Israel On Campus Coalition Inc; the most unlike its peers is Foundation to Combat Anti-Semitism Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $200,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEEANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION+1 more: $10,000 · Civil RightsISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $85,000 · InternationalISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCECOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $70,000 · InternationalCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MI…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $20,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DA…Holocaust Center For Humanity: $75,000 · OtherHolocaust Center For …Hillel Foundation for Jewish Life at the University of Washington: $60,000 · OtherHillel Foundation for…ISRAEL ON CAMPUS COALITION INC: $65,000 · EducationISRAEL ON …The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $10,000 · Arts & CultureHONESTREPORTINGCOM INC: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Civil Rights$310,000International$175,000Other$135,000Education$65,000Arts & Culture$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $200,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $85,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHolocaust Center For Humanity: $75,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $70,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetISRAEL ON CAMPUS COALITION INC: $65,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHillel Foundation for Jewish Life at the University of Washington: $60,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHONESTREPORTINGCOM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bloome Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bloome Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bloome Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home