Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bloom Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$366kCrime & Legal$330kInternational$274kPublic Safety & Disaster$100kPublic Benefit$68kHousing & Shelter$55kHealth$20kCivil Rights$10k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NAEH$20,000
FAIRVOTE$11,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $435k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WHAT IF FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%WHAT IF FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $50k → 17%WHAT IF FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $50k → 17%WHAT IF FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $50k → 17%WHAT IF FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $45k → 17%WHAT IF FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $45k → 17%WHAT IF FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $30k → 17%WHAT IF FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $30k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $30k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CA
VA
MD
NC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$933k · 8 repeat orgs$290k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +120% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

$933k
$290k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+120%
0%

Still filing today

63%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterInternationalCivil RightsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $330k · revenue +135%
  • PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $169k · revenue +120%
  • WI
    What If Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $105k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • DW
    DRS WITHOUT BORDERS
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
  • BA
    BELOVED ASHEVILLE
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Women in Global Health Inc

Women in global health (wgh) is a global movement and organization that brings together all genders and backgrounds to achieve gender equality in global health leadership.

Public Benefit
2
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
3
World Hope International Inc

The purpose of world hope international, inc. (whi) includes providing assistance to economically disadvantaged people through long-term social transformation projects, including anti-trafficking protection, clean water, economic…

International
4
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
5
Witness Inc

Witness helps people use video and technology to protect and defend human rights. witness is working towards a world where the communities we center, serve, and support can safely and effectively use video and technology to end human…

International
6
Health Poverty Action Usa

Health Poverty Action USA acts in solidarity with health workers, activists & communities worldwide to improve health & challenge the causes of poverty. We do this in 3 distinct ways: 1. We approach health as an issue of social justice. We…

International
7
Guttmacher Institute Inc

The institute is a leading research and policy organization committed to advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in the united states and globally.

—
8
The Virtue Foundation

Virtue foundation's mission is to increase awareness, inspire action, and render assistance through initiatives on healthcare, education, and women and justice programs, as well as innovative work in research and analytics.

Public Benefit
9
Patient Safety Movement Foundation

Our mission is to disseminate actionable, evidence-based practices, advance their integration by healthcare organizations, and cultivate data transparency by 2030.

Education
10
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
11
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
12
Charity Global Inc

Charity: water is a non-profit organization bringing clean and safe water to people around the world. continued on schedule o.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Georgia Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $330,000 · Human ServicesTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INCWhat If Foundation: $105,000 · Human ServicesWhat If FoundationOPERATION SMITH: $138,000 · OtherOPERATION SMITHNAEH: $120,000 · OtherNAEHDRS WITHOUT BORDERS: $100,000 · OtherDRS WITHOUT BORDERS+2 more: $18,000 · OtherPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $169,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEA…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $100,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTR…OPERATION SMILE INC: $20,000 · InternationalOPERATION S…FAIRVOTE: $58,000 · Civil RightsNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC: $10,000 · Civil RightsBELOVED ASHEVILLE: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterStepping Stones Shelter Inc: $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$435,000Other$376,000Health$169,000International$120,000Civil Rights$68,000Housing & Shelter$55,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $330,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $169,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWhat If Foundation: $105,000 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAIRVOTE: $58,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetBELOVED ASHEVILLE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetStepping Stones Shelter Inc: $5,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds What If Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds FAIRVOTE ↗
  • Who funds BELOVED ASHEVILLE ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Stepping Stones Shelter Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bloom Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bloom Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bloom’s filings →

More from the funding graph