Skip to content
Bloodworks at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Bloodworks

Saving lives through research, innovation, education and excellence in blood, medical and laboratory services in partnership with our community.

$368k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$5.9MEducation$325k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $77,594, the rows itemized in this filing. The $368,077 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $290,483 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $18k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$9,609
Median grant
2
States reached
$117M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$59,511
WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR COAGULATION$9,609
BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$8,474
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 35% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PENN STATE HERSHEY: $11k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: $11k → 14%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $105k → 16%OREGON HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY: $61k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $141k → 13%VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $11k → 14%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $469k → 14%TERUMO BCT INC: $411k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $22k → 10%WA INSTITUTE FOR COAGULATION: $27k → 9%Bleeding Disorder Foundation of WA: $75k → 9%PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES: $26k → 12%BLEEDING & CLOTTING DISORDER INSTITUTE: $11k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $562k → 8%THE RECTOR & VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $57k → 22%THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $19k → 23%BAYLOR COLLEGE: $59k → 16%OREGON HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY: $11k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $54k → 13%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $140k → 14%TERUMO BCT INC: $395k → 7%University of Colorado: $18k → 10%SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER: $58k → 9%RECTOR & VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY: $200k → 8%BAYLOR COLLEGE: $46k → 16%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $105k → 14%WA INSTITUTE FOR COAGULATION: $18k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $80k → 8%BAYLOR COLLEGE: $39k → 16%SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER: $33k → 9%University of Virginia: $26k → 8%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $31k → 16%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $30k → 16%SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER: $13k → 9%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $30k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $248k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $169k → 9%University of Washington: $136k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $93k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $60k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $59k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $58k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $58k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $54k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $52k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $33k → 9%UNIVERISTY OF WASHINGTON: $29k → 9%SEATTLE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $34k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
NY
OR
PA
CT
UT
CO
VA
TN
NC
LA
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.6M · 14 repeat orgs$153k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
6

Total granted

$4.6M
$153k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+35%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EU
    Emory University
    4× · 2018–2021 · $725k · revenue +61%
  • BC
    Baylor College of Medicine
    9× · 2017–2025 · $473k · revenue +67%
  • SH
    SWEDISH HEALTH SERVICES
    3× · 2022–2024 · $103k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • TB
    The Bleeding Disorder Foundation of Washington
    one grant, 2017 · $75k · revenue -13%
  • SC
    SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITALgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $34k · revenue +65%
  • PS
    PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
2
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
3
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
4
Rhode Island Hospital

As a founding hospital in the brown university health system, rih is committed to its mission: delivering health with care.

Health
5
Washington University

The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)

Education
6
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
7
Emergency Medical Services at the University of Washington
Health
8
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
9
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
10
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
11
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
12
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Washington Institute for Coagulation; the most unlike its peers is The Bleeding Disorder Foundation of Washington. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $1,047,724 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONRECTOR & VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $924,812 · OtherRECTOR & VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIATERUMO BCT INC: $805,315 · OtherTERUMO BCT INCUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $195,773 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL+7 more: $272,917 · Other+7 moreYale University: $1,472,393 · EducationYale UniversityEmory University: $724,554 · EducationEmory UniversityBaylor College of Medicine: $472,880 · EducationBaylor College of Medicine+2 more: $38,999 · EducationSWEDISH HEALTH SERVICES: $102,677 · HealthWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR COAGULATION: $62,601 · HealthPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES - WASHINGTON: $34,336 · HealthSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $33,856 · HealthBLEEDING & CLOTTING DISORDERS INSTITUTE: $18,800 · HealthVanderbilt University Medical Center: $11,000 · Health
Other$3,246,541Education$2,708,826Health$263,270

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYale University: $1,472,393 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University: $724,554 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $472,880 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSWEDISH HEALTH SERVICES: $102,677 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Bleeding Disorder Foundation of Washington: $75,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR COAGULATION: $62,601 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES - WASHINGTON: $34,336 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $33,856 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $25,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLEEDING & CLOTTING DISORDERS INSTITUTE: $18,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $13,499 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
  • Who funds SWEDISH HEALTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds The Bleeding Disorder Foundation of Washington ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR COAGULATION ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES - WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds BLEEDING & CLOTTING DISORDERS INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University Medical Center ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bloodworks funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bloodworks. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bloodworks’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home