Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Blanchard 2234 Charitable Foundation

TO ESTABLISH A CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION TO RECEIVE CONTRIBUTIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONTRIBUTING FINANCIALLY TO LOCAL CAUSES.

$89k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Recreation & Sports$126kPublic Safety & Disaster$70kEducation$29kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$180k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Ottawa Glandorf Athletic Boosters$30,300
Saint Peter Paul School Boosters$28,500
Glandorf Volunteer Fire Department$10,000
Glandorf Park Board Association$10,000
Ottawa Volunteer Fire Department$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%Glandorf Park Board Association: $16k → 7%Glandorf Volunteer Fire Department: $10k → 7%Glandorf Park Board Association: $10k → 7%GLANDORF FIRE DEPARTMENT: $10k → 7%Glandorf Volunteer Fire Department: $10k → 7%Glandorf Volunteer Fire Department: $10k → 7%Ottawa Glandorf Athletic Boosters: $30k → 7%Ottawa Glandorf Athletic Boosters: $30k → 7%OTTAWA GLANDORF ATHLETIC BOOSTERS: $30k → 7%Saint Peter Paul School Boosters: $29k → 7%OTTAWA FIRE DEPARTMENT: $10k → 7%Ottawa Volunteer Fire Department: $10k → 7%Ottawa Volunteer Fire Department: $10k → 7%Ottawa Volunteer Fire Department: $10k → 7%Village of Ottawa: $10k → 7%Ottawa Glandorf Athletic Boosters: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$186k · 4 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
3

Total granted

$186k
$30k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OG
    OTTAWA GLANDORF ATHLETIC BOOSTERS
    4× · 2022–2025 · $100k · revenue -63%
  • GV
    Glandorf Volunteer Fire Department
    3× · 2023–2025 · $30k
  • OV
    Ottawa Volunteer Fire Department
    3× · 2023–2025 · $30k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • GF
    GLANDORF FIRE DEPT
    one grant, 2022 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
1/3
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OTTAWA GLANDORF ATHLETIC BOOSTERS — $100,300 · OtherOTTAWA GLANDORF ATHLETIC BOOSTERSGlandorf Volunteer Fire Department — $30,000 · OtherGlandorf Volunteer Fire DepartmentOttawa Volunteer Fire Department — $30,000 · OtherOttawa Volunteer Fire DepartmentSAINT PETER & PAUL SCHOOL BOOSTERS — $28,500 · OtherSAINT PETER & PAUL SCHOOL BOOSTERSIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherGLANDORF FIRE DEPT — $10,000 · OtherGlandorf Park Board Association Inc — $26,000 · Public Safety & DisasterGlandorf Par…
Other$218,800Public Safety & Disaster$26,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOTTAWA GLANDORF ATHLETIC BOOSTERS — $100,300 over 4y, 10% of budgetSAINT PETER & PAUL SCHOOL BOOSTERS — $28,500 over 1y, 12% of budgetGlandorf Park Board Association Inc — $26,000 over 2y, 17% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OTTAWA GLANDORF ATHLETIC BOOSTERS
  • Who funds SAINT PETER & PAUL SCHOOL BOOSTERS
  • Who funds Glandorf Park Board Association Inc

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Blanchard 2234 Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Blanchard 2234 Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Blanchard 2234 Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph