Skip to content

· Private foundation

Black Swan Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$66k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$174kEducation$80kPublic Safety & Disaster$11kAnimals$7kYouth Development$5kHousing & Shelter$4kHuman Services$3kPhilanthropy$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $41k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$666k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JDRF$21,000
Bel Air Bay Club$10,000
American Cancer Society$10,000
Phase One Foundation$7,000
University of North Carolina$5,000
Planned Parenthood$5,000
Saint Narys School$3,000
Paws Chicago$1,000
American Red Cross$1,000
Wounded Warrior Project$1,000
Habitat for Humanity$1,000
Montshire Museum of Science$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Wounded Warrior Project: $1k → 14%American Red Cross: $2k → 14%Wounded Warriors Project: $500 → 14%American Red Cross: $1k → 14%Wounded Warrior Project: $500 → 14%American Red Cross: $1k → 14%Wounded Warrior Project: $500 → 14%American Red Cross: $1k → 14%American Red Cross: $1k → 14%American Red Cross: $1k → 14%American Red Cross: $1k → 14%American Red Cross: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
OR
CA
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$276k · 15 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
9

Total granted

$276k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+1304%

Still filing today

53%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsEducationPhilanthropyPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PO
    PHASE ONE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $57k · revenue +149%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    8× · 2017–2024 · $9k · revenue +46%
  • PC
    PAWS CHICAGO
    8× · 2017–2024 · $6k · revenue +163%

Funded once

  • NL
    NAACP Legal Defence Fund
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue ×63
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
2
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
3
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
4
St Marys Healthcare System for Children Inc

To serve as the sole member of the various health care and supporting organizations that comprise st. mary's healthcare system for children

Health
5
American Society of Anesthesiologists

Advancing the practice and securing the future of anesthesiology through medical education, creation and dissemination of new knowledge, improvement of patient care, and legislative and regulatory advocacy.

—
6
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
7
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
8
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
9
American Astronomical Society

The american astronomical society (aas), established in 1899, is the major organization of professional astronomers in north america. the basic objective of the aas is to promote the advancement of astronomy and closely related branches of…

Science & Tech
10
National Comprehensive Cancer Network

To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.

Health
11
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
12
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Saint Marys School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of North Carolina: $46,875 · OtherUniversity of North CarolinaJuvenile Diabetes: $32,500 · OtherJuvenile DiabetesJDRF: $31,000 · OtherJDRFIndividual grant recipient: $17,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPlanned Parenthood: $16,500 · OtherPlanned ParenthoodBel Air Bay Club: $15,000 · OtherBel Air Bay Club+7 more: $8,001 · OtherPHASE ONE FOUNDATION: $56,500 · HealthPHASE ONE FOUNDATIONAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $35,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC+1 more: $1,000 · HealthAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $8,500 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesPAWS CHICAGO: $5,500 · AnimalsDOGS FOR THE DEAF INC DBA DOGS FOR BETTER LIVES: $1,500 · AnimalsSAINT MARYS SCHOOL: $3,000 · EducationBRENTWOOD SCHOOL: $1,675 · EducationLOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Public Safety & DisasterMONTSHIRE MUSEUM OF SCIENCE INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropySLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $700 · Housing & Shelter
Other$166,876Health$92,500Human Services$11,000Animals$7,000Education$4,675Public Safety & Disaster$2,000Philanthropy$2,000Housing & Shelter$700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPHASE ONE FOUNDATION: $56,500 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $35,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $8,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS CHICAGO: $5,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT MARYS SCHOOL: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMONTSHIRE MUSEUM OF SCIENCE INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBRENTWOOD SCHOOL: $1,675 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDOGS FOR THE DEAF INC DBA DOGS FOR BETTER LIVES: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PHASE ONE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds PAWS CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds SAINT MARYS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MONTSHIRE MUSEUM OF SCIENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds BRENTWOOD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds DOGS FOR THE DEAF INC DBA DOGS FOR BETTER LIVES ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Black Swan Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Black Swan Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Montshire Museum of Science Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Black Swan’s filings →

More from the funding graph