Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Black River Education and Wellness Foundation

To promote and support health and wellness initiatives which will contribute to the improvement of life for the residents of the greater lorain county area.

$105k
Granted FY2023
4
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Food & Nutrition$152kPhilanthropy$130kHealth$85kEducation$36kCivil Rights$30kHuman Services$15k
02FY2023 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$35,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OBERLIN FOOD HUB$35,000
ALS ASSOCIATION NORTHERN OHIO CHAPTER$35,000
LORAIN COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE$25,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER LORAIN COUNTY - UNITED WE SWEAT PROGRAM$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 30% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%UNITED WAY OF GREATER LORAIN COUNTY - UNITED WE SWEAT PROGRAM: $10k → 13%THE VILLAGE PROJECT: $50k → 17%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LORAIN CTY: $100k → 13%GLORIA S WAY: $40k → 17%SAVE OUR CHILDREN: $30k → 13%GLORIA S WAY: $10k → 17%LORAIN COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $25k → 13%ALS ASSOCIATION NORTHERN OHIO CHAPTER: $35k → 17%SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE: $15k → 13%UNIVERSITY HOSPTIALS EMC: $11k → 13%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LORAIN COUN: $10k → 13%OBERLIN FOOD HUB: $35k → 13%PARTY FOR THE PUZZLE: $10k → 13%SECOND HARVEST OF NORTH CENTRAL OHI: $34k → 13%SECOND HARVEST OF NORTH CENTRAL OHI: $33k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Great Lakes Community Action Partnership

The mission of great lakes community action partnership is to create partnerships and opportunites to help individuals, families and communities thrive.

Human Services
2
Lorain County Safe Harbor Corp

The organization provides a comprehensive range of family focused services for lorain county, ohio victims of domestic violence. we endeavor to be a part of collaborative community

Human Services
3
Food Bank of Iowa

The organization receives, warehouses, and distributes salvageable food items to non-profit tax exempt member agencies to feed the ill, needy, and infants.

Food & Nutrition
4
Ohio Tri County Food Alliance Dba Second Harvest Food Bank

The mission of ohio tri county food alliance/second harvest food bank is to alleviate hunger in clark, champaign, and logan counties by sourcing and distributing nutritious food to people in need, building community partnerships, and…

Food & Nutrition
5
Sheboygan County Food Bank Inc

Lead sheboygan county's efforts to increase the food security of its residents by distributing healthy emergency food and fostering innovative partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
6
Lake Country Caring Inc

To provide basic necessities at no cost to those in need.

Human Services
7
Toledo Northwestern Ohio Food Bank

To enable other community organizations to end hunger. we strive to maximize community resources by effectively obtaining and distributing food through a food collection and distribution system.

Food & Nutrition
8
Local Food Solutions

We work to expand access to local food for more people in the community through the purchase, aggregation, storage, marketing and delivery of fresh, safe, local food in partnership with local growers.

Food & Nutrition
9
Oshkosh Area Community Pantry Inc

The oshkosh area community pantry strives to eliminate food insecurity.

Food & Nutrition
10
Virginia Community Food Connections

Our mission is to ensure the availability, access, and affordability of locally produced food by connecting local farmers and all members of the community through programs, awareness, and advocacy.

Food & Nutrition
11
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
12
United Way of Greater Lima Inc

United Way improves lives by uniting the caring power of our community.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Lorain County and the most unlike its peers is United Way of Greater Lorain County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LORAIN COUNTY — $110,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LORAIN…UNITED WAY OF GREATER LORAIN COUNTY INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER LORAIN C…SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO — $67,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF NO…VILLAGE PROJECT — $50,000 · Food & NutritionVILLAGE PROJECTGLORIA S WAY — $40,000 · OtherGLORIA S WAYSAVE OUR CHILDREN — $30,000 · OtherSAVE OUR CHILDRENLORAIN COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $25,000 · OtherLORAIN COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLE…UNIVERSITY HOSPTIALS EMC — $11,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY HOSPTIALS EMCPARTY FOR THE PUZZLE — $10,000 · OtherPARTY FOR THE PUZZLEFOREST CITY FOOD COLLECTIVE — $35,000 · Community ImprovementFOREST CITY…Impact Online Inc — $10,000 · Community ImprovementImpact Onli…THE ALS ASSOCIATION NORTHERN OHIO CHAPTER — $35,000 · HealthSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC — $15,000 · Housing & Shelter
Philanthropy$120,000Food & Nutrition$117,000Other$116,000Community Improvement$45,000Health$35,000Housing & Shelter$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LORAIN COUNTY — $110,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO — $67,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFOREST CITY FOOD COLLECTIVE — $35,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetTHE ALS ASSOCIATION NORTHERN OHIO CHAPTER — $35,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER LORAIN COUNTY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetImpact Online Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community West FoundationOH19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community West Foundation · The Nord Family Foundation · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · Norton Family Foundation · Lakeland Community Foundation · Miraldi Family Pvt Fdn · Community Foundation of Lorain County · The Cleveland Clinic Foundation · The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Group Return · Charities Aid Foundation America · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Black River Education and Wellness Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Black River Education and Wellness Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Black River Education and Wellness Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $201k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph