Skip to content

· Community foundation

Bird City Century II Development Foundation

The primpary purpose of the BIRD CITY CENTURY II DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION is to promote the needs of the community, specifically bird city, kansas and the cheylin school district, in which it serves to provide community education concerning the organization's activities and needs.

$468k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$104k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$239kHuman Services$170kReligion$151kPublic Benefit$128kHealth$111kEducation$101kHousing & Shelter$18kCommunity Improvement$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $433,899, the rows itemized in this filing. The $468,076 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $34,177 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $156k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $247k
$12,008
Median grant
1
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREAT PLAINS OF CHEYENNE CO$103,569
TRI-STATE ANTIQUE ENGINE AND THRESHERS ASSOCIATION INC$82,225
USD #103 CHEYLIN$61,272
COUGAR CUB DAYCARE INC$42,905
CITY OF BIRD CITY$33,264
FEDERATED CHURCH OF MCDONALD$22,289
CHEYENNE COUNTY$14,410
ST JOHN NEPOMUCENE CATHOLIC CHURCH$12,008
BIRD CITY AREA ON AGING INC$10,550
WESLEYAN COMMUNITY CHURCH$10,270
MCDONALD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC$10,000
BIRD CITY COMMUNITY CLUB$7,740
BIRD CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY$6,897
Individual grant recipient$5,900
ST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCH$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%FEDERATED CHURCH OF MCDONALD: $22k → 11%TRI-STATE ANTIQUE ENGINE AND THRESHERS ASSOCIATION INC: $93k → 13%ST JOHN NEPOMUCENE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $12k → 11%TRI-STATE ANTIQUE ENGINE AND THRESHERS ASSOCIATION INC: $82k → 13%FEDERATED CHURCH OF MCDONALD: $12k → 11%USD #103 CHEYLIN: $61k → 13%FEDERATED CHURCH OF MCDONALD: $11k → 11%TRI-STATE ANTIQUE ENGINE AND THRESHERS ASSOCIATION INC: $57k → 13%MCDONALD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC: $10k → 11%CITY OF BIRD CITY: $55k → 13%MCDONALD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC: $8k → 11%COUGAR CUB DAYCARE INC: $43k → 13%COUGAR CUB DAYCARE INC: $40k → 13%COUGAR CUB DAYCARE INC: $35k → 13%CITY OF BIRD CITY: $33k → 13%BIRD CITY AREA ON AGING INC: $26k → 13%CITY OF BIRD CITY: $26k → 13%USD #103 CHEYLIN: $25k → 13%ST JOHN LUTHERAN CHURCH: $21k → 13%BIRD CITY AREA ON AGING INC: $16k → 13%USD #103 CHEYLIN: $15k → 13%ST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCH: $14k → 13%BIRD CITY AREA ON AGING INC: $11k → 13%WESLEYAN COMMUNITY CHURCH: $10k → 13%IMMANUEL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $10k → 13%IMMANUEL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $10k → 13%BIRD CITY COMMUNITY CLUB: $8k → 13%BIRD CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $7k → 13%ST JOHN LUTHERAN CHURCH: $6k → 13%BIRD CITY CEMETERY: $6k → 13%WESLEYAN COMMUNITY CHURCH: $6k → 13%WESLEYAN COMMUNITY CHURCH: $6k → 13%BIRD CITY COMMUNITY CLUB: $6k → 13%ST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCH: $6k → 13%ST JOHN LUTHERAN CHURCH: $5k → 13%GREAT PLAINS OF CHEYENNE CO: $104k → 13%CHEYENNE COUNTY: $14k → 13%CHEYENNE COUNTY: $11k → 13%CHEYENNE COUNTY EMS AUXILIARY INC: $7k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$658k · 11 repeat orgs$291k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$658k
$33k

Still filing today

27%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $258k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
EducationHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    TRI STATE ANTIQUE ENGINE & THRESHERS ASSOCIATION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $232k · revenue +100% · 46% of their budget
  • CC
    COUGAR CUB DAYCARE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $118k · revenue +123% · 37% of their budget
  • CO
    CITY OF BIRD CITY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $81k

Funded once

  • US
    UNITED STATES CATHOLIC CONFERENCE
    one grant, 2022 · $14k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $11k
  • CC
    CHEYENNE COUNTY EMS AUXILIARY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRI STATE ANTIQUE ENGINE & THRESHERS ASSOCIATION INC: $232,088 · OtherTRI STATE ANTIQUE ENGINE & THRESHERS ASSOCIATION INCCITY OF BIRD CITY: $80,546 · OtherCITY OF BIRD CITYUSD #103 CHEYLIN: $61,272 · OtherUSD #103 CHEYLINBIRD CITY AREA ON AGING INC: $52,751 · OtherBIRD CITY AREA ON AGING INCFEDERATED CHURCH OF MCDONALD: $45,458 · OtherFEDERATED CHURCH OF MCDONALDUSD #103 CHEYLIN: $39,753 · OtherUSD #103 CHEYLINCITY OF BIRD CITY: $33,264 · OtherLUTHERAN CHURCH MISSOURI SYNOD: $27,050 · Other+13 more: $137,388 · Other+13 moreCOUGAR CUB DAYCARE INC: $117,586 · EducationCOUGAR CUB DAY…GREAT PLAINS OF CHEYENNE COUNTY INC: $103,569 · HealthGREAT PLAINS…MCDONALD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC: $18,000 · Community Improvement
Other$709,570Education$117,586Health$103,569Community Improvement$18,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRI STATE ANTIQUE ENGINE & THRESHERS ASSOCIATION INC: $232,088 over 3y, 46% of budgetCOUGAR CUB DAYCARE INC: $117,586 over 3y, 37% of budgetGREAT PLAINS OF CHEYENNE COUNTY INC: $103,569 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMCDONALD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC: $18,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRI STATE ANTIQUE ENGINE & THRESHERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COUGAR CUB DAYCARE INC ↗
  • Who funds GREAT PLAINS OF CHEYENNE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds MCDONALD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Northwest Kansas Community FoundationKS28.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Northwest Kansas Community Foundation · Dane G Hansen Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bird City Century II Development Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bird City Century II Development Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bird City Century II Development’s filings →

    More from the funding graph