Skip to content

· Private foundation

Birches Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$195k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Civil Rights$145kInternational$105kScience & Tech$45kHuman Services$30kEducation$20kArts & Culture$10kEnvironment$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$15,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
American Friends Service Committee$50,000
Amnesty International$20,200
Brennan Center for Justice$20,000
Doctors Without Borders$20,000
International Rescue Committee$15,000
Union of Concerned Scientists$15,000
Brady Center$15,000
UNICEF USA$10,000
American Civil Liberties Union$10,000
Hudson River Sloop Clearwater$5,000
Sierra Club$5,000
Giffords Law Center$5,000
Karuna Center$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Union of Concerned Scientists: $15k → 8%Karuna Center: $5k → 12%American Friends Service Committee: $50k → 22%Giffords Law Center: $5k → 10%Hudson River Sloop: $5k → 9%UNICEF USA: $10k → 17%Brady Center for Gun Violence: $15k → 14%Music in Common: $5k → 13%Union of Concerned Scientists: $15k → 8%Karuna Center: $5k → 12%AFSC: $20k → 22%Giffords Law Center: $5k → 10%Hudson River Sloop: $5k → 9%Doctors Without Borders: $20k → 17%Brady Center: $15k → 14%Music in Common: $5k → 13%Union of Concerned Scientists: $15k → 8%AFSC: $20k → 22%Giffords Law Center: $5k → 10%Hudson River Sloop Clearwater: $5k → 9%Doctors Without Borders: $10k → 17%Brady Center for Gun Violence: $15k → 14%Sierra Club: $5k → 10%Doctors Without Borders: $10k → 17%Various see attached: $103k → 17%Brennan Center: $20k → 17%Brennan Center for Justice: $20k → 17%Brennan Center: $20k → 17%International Rescue Committee: $15k → 17%International Rescue Committee: $10k → 17%International Rescue Committee: $10k → 17%Amnesty International: $20k → 17%American Civil Liberties Union: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$280k · 10 repeat orgs$135k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +1% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
8

Total granted

$280k
$135k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
0%

Still filing today

50%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $135k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
InternationalEducationEnvironmentCivil RightsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue +13%
  • GIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $15k · revenue +1%
  • MI
    MUSIC IN COMMON INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $10k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $50k
  • AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue 0%
  • WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INCgraduated
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners

Founded in 1889, the national association of regulatory utility commisioners (naruc) is a non-profit organization dedicated to representing the state public service commisions who regulate the utilities that provide essential services such…

—
2
International Life Sciences Institute

Ilsi is a global, nonprofit federation dedicated to generating and advancing emerging science and groundbreaking research to ensure foods are safe, nutritious and sustainable, and that they improve planetary and human health and well-being…

Science & Tech
3
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
4
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
5
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
6
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…

Science & Tech
7
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
8
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
9
International Federation of Accountants

Ifac acts in the public interest and has no profit-making purpose. ifac serves the public interest by: speaking out and engaging as the voice for the global profession; leading and developing a future-ready accountancy profession; and…

Education
10
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
11
American National Standards Institute

To enhance both the global competitiveness of u.s. business and the u.s. quality of life by promoting and facilitating voluntary consensus standards and conformity assessment systems, and safeguarding their integrity.

Public Benefit
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amnesty International of the Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE: $50,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEEBrennan Center: $40,000 · OtherBrennan CenterAFSC: $40,000 · OtherAFSCBrady Center for Gun Violence: $30,000 · OtherBrady Center for Gun ViolenceBrady Center: $15,000 · OtherBrady CenterKaruna Center: $15,000 · OtherKaruna CenterIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherAmerican Civil Liberties Union: $10,000 · Other+1 more: $5,000 · OtherTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $45,000 · InternationalTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INCMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $40,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCInternational Rescue Committee INC: $35,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INCAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $20,200 · InternationalAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INCUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $10,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $20,000 · EducationGIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $15,000 · Civil RightsMUSIC IN COMMON INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureHUDSON RIVER SLOOP CLEARWATER INC: $5,000 · Environment
Other$215,000International$150,200Education$20,000Civil Rights$15,000Arts & Culture$10,000Environment$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $45,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $20,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $15,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSIC IN COMMON INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetHUDSON RIVER SLOOP CLEARWATER INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds GIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC IN COMMON INC ↗
  • Who funds HUDSON RIVER SLOOP CLEARWATER INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Birches Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Birches Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Birches Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Birches Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Birches’ filings →

    More from the funding graph