Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

North Carolina · Private foundation

Bhupen and Chetna Patel Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$35k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
4
Grants FY2024
3
Organizations funded FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$15,000
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$3.0M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site
86% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$59kHuman Services$10kArts & Culture$5kAnimals$2kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Rowan Helping Ministries$10,00010%
Gujrati Cultural Assoc of Piedmont$5,25115%
India Street Paws Incorporated$2,0001n/a

Plus 3 recipients with no EIN on record ($64k), not named here.

Compare Bhupen and Chetna Patel Family Foundation with peer funders

About Bhupen and Chetna Patel Family Foundation

How much does Bhupen and Chetna Patel Family Foundation give?
Bhupen and Chetna Patel Family Foundation reported 4 grants totaling $35,251 in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does Bhupen and Chetna Patel Family Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2024, its largest causes are Food & Nutrition (72%), Human Services (12%), Arts & Culture (6%).
Who are Bhupen and Chetna Patel Family Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2023 to FY2024: Rowan Helping Ministries ($10k), Gujrati Cultural Assoc of Piedmont ($5k), India Street Paws Incorporated ($2k).
Does Bhupen and Chetna Patel Family Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Where is Bhupen and Chetna Patel Family Foundation based?
Bhupen and Chetna Patel Family Foundation is based in NC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bhupen and Chetna Patel Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home