Skip to content

· Private foundation

Beverly A Basile Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$92k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Doctors Without Borders$1,000
National MS Society$1,000
Dana-Farber$1,000
Arts Empowering Life$1,000
St Jude's Children's Research Hospital$500
St Mary's Church$500
Village Improvement Society$500
Eventide Theater Company$500
Individual grant recipient$250
Dennis Conservation Land Trust$250
Cape Cod Museum of Art$250
Cape Rep Theater$250
Vivace Vilnius Project$200
Samaritans$200
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 29% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Vivace Vilnius Project: $200 → 7%St Mary's Church: $500 → 8%National MS Society: $1k → 8%Samaritans: $200 → 16%Doctors Without Borders: $1k → 17%St Jude's Children's Research Hospital: $500 → 17%Catholic Appeal: $2k → 7%Dennis Conservation Land Trust: $250 → 8%Dana-Farber: $1k → 16%Brookeline Police: $250 → 7%Village Improvement Society: $500 → 8%WBUR: $100 → 16%Brookeline Library: $200 → 7%Eventide Theater Company: $500 → 8%Cape Cod Museum of Art: $250 → 8%Arts Empowering Life: $1k → 8%Cape Rep Theater: $250 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Massachusetts Medical Society

To advance medical knowledge, to develop and maintain the highest professional and ethical standards of medical practice and health care, and to promote medical institutions formed on liberal principles for the health, benefit, and welfare…

—
3
The Massachusetts Society for Medical Research Inc

To educate the public, media and members of the legislative, veterinary, and medical profession of medical advancement from animal research.

Health
4
Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network Inc

The mission of Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network (DFCCN) is to promote and support, directly or indirectly, the interests and purposes of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI).

Health
5
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
6
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
7
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
8
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
9
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
10
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
11
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
12
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Dennis Conservation Land Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDANA-FARBER INC: $1,000 · OtherDANA-FARBER INCVillage Improvement Society: $500 · OtherVillage Improvement SocietySt Mary's Church: $500 · OtherSt Mary's ChurchEventide Theater Company: $500 · OtherEventide Theater CompanyCape Rep Theater: $250 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $250 · OtherVIVACE VILNIUS PROJECT: $200 · OtherBrookeline Library: $200 · Other+1 more: $100 · OtherNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $1,000 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE S…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S …SAMARITANS INC: $200 · HealthSAMARITANS INCARTS EMPOWERING LIFE INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureARTS EMPOWERIN…THE CAPE COD MUSEUM OF ART INC: $250 · Arts & CultureTHE CAPE COD M…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SA…THE DENNIS CONSERVATION LAND TRUST: $250 · Environment
Other$5,500Health$1,700Arts & Culture$1,250International$1,000Environment$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARTS EMPOWERING LIFE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDANA-FARBER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITANS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Beverly A Basile Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Beverly A Basile Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Samaritans Inc: 31% of income from government
  • Arts Empowering Life Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • The Cape Cod Museum of Art Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Beverly A Basile’s filings →

More from the funding graph