Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

Washington, D.C. · Public charity

Better Jobs Together

None

$114k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
Organizations funded FY2023
100%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2023
$113,691
Largest grant, FY2023
$113,691
Organizations funded a year
1 to 2
FY2022 to FY2023
States reached, FY2023
1

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 100% of the organizations Better Jobs Together funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20231$114k100%
FY20222$136kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2023.

Public Benefit$136kEmployment$114k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2022 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Democratic Majority for Israel D/B/A Dmfi$115,65014%
Workers for America's Future$113,69119%
House Majority Forward$20,00010%

Compare Better Jobs Together with peer funders

About Better Jobs Together

How much does Better Jobs Together give?
Better Jobs Together reported 1 grants totaling $113,691 in its FY2023 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 2 organizations a year over FY2022 to FY2023.
What does Better Jobs Together fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2023, its largest causes are Public Benefit (54%), Employment (46%).
Who are Better Jobs Together's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2022 to FY2023: Democratic Majority for Israel D/B/A Dmfi ($116k), Workers for America's Future ($114k), House Majority Forward ($20k).
Does Better Jobs Together fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is Better Jobs Together based?
Better Jobs Together is based in DC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home