Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bernard & Irene Schwartz Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$130k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$130k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$1.2MCivil Rights$1.1MHealth$530kReligion$146kArts & Culture$55kPublic Benefit$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$130,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NYU LANGONE HEALTH$130,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%TUFTS UNIVERSITY: $75k → 8%EXEMPLARY FILMS INC: $30k → 6%EZRAH TORAH: $25k → 14%THE NEW SCHOOL: $10k → 17%THIRD WAY INSTITUTE: $1.0M → 14%DRAKE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 10%TUFTS UNIVERSITY: $75k → 8%PORTLEDGE SCHOOL: $28k → 6%NYU LAGONE HEALTH: $400k → 17%FAIR ELECTION CENTER: $50k → 14%NYU LANGONE HEALTH: $130k → 17%CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE: $50k → 17%CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE: $50k → 17%CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE: $13k → 17%CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE: $8k → 17%THE NEW SCHOOL UNIVERSITY: $1.0M → 17%TEMPLE EMANUEL: $25k → 17%THE CANALES PROJECT: $25k → 17%THE CENTURY FOUNDATION: $125k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 3 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
10

Total granted

$1.3M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+27%

Still filing today

67%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
EducationCivil RightsInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    The New School
    2× · 2017–2019 · $1.0M · revenue +24%
  • Trustees of Tufts College
    2× · 2017–2018 · $150k · revenue +50%
  • CS
    CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE
    4× · 2019–2022 · $121k

Funded once

  • TW
    THIRD WAY INSTITUTEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1.0M · revenue +81%
  • NL
    NYU LAGONE HEALTH
    one grant, 2023 · $400k
  • TC
    THE CENTURY FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $125k · revenue +27%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
3
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

7
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
8
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
9
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
10
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
11
Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Wpi transforms lives, turns knowledge into action to confront global challenges, and revolutionizes stem through distinctive and inclusive education, projects and research. (http://www.wpi.edu/about/mission.html)

12
Mitchell College

Mitchell college educates students through a highly individualized educational approach that brings forward each student's potential, reveals their strengths, and fosters personal growth.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Century Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Exemplary Film Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The New School — $1,010,000 · EducationThe New SchoolTrustees of Tufts College — $150,000 · EducationTrustees of Tufts College+1 more — $20,000 · EducationTHIRD WAY INSTITUTE — $1,000,000 · Civil RightsTHIRD WAY INSTITUTETHE CENTURY FOUNDATION INC — $125,000 · Civil RightsTHE CENTURY FOUNDATION INCFair Elections Center — $50,000 · Civil RightsNYU LAGONE HEALTH — $400,000 · OtherNYU LAGONE HEALTHNYU LANGONE HEALTH — $130,000 · OtherNYU LANGONE HEALTHCENTRAL SYNAGOGUE — $120,500 · OtherCENTRAL SYNAGOGUEEXEMPLARY FILM INC — $30,000 · OtherPORTLEDGE SCHOOL — $27,710 · Other+2 more — $50,000 · Other+2 moreTHE CANALES PROJECT INC — $25,000 · International
Education$1,180,000Civil Rights$1,175,000Other$758,210International$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe New School — $1,010,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHIRD WAY INSTITUTE — $1,000,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College — $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFair Elections Center — $50,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetEXEMPLARY FILM INC — $30,000 over 1y, 94% of budgetPORTLEDGE SCHOOL — $27,710 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CANALES PROJECT INC — $25,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetDRAKE UNIVERSITY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bernard & Irene Schwartz Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 13%
  • Trustees of Tufts College13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bernard & Irene Schwartz Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Bernard & Irene Schwartz Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph