Skip to content

· Public charity

Berkeley Film Foundation

The Berkeley FILM Foundation is a 501(c)(3) grant and educational program for independent filmmakers with a mission to nurture, sustain and preserve the thriving local film community while attracting the next generation of filmmakers.

$266k
Granted FY2020
5
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Arts & Culture$219kCivil Rights$20kCommunity Improvement$12k
02FY2020 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $126,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $265,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $139,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $49k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$12,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$724k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Independent Documentary$70,000
Kilgust & Cohen LLC$25,000
Swell Cinema$12,000
Freedom Bound Center$12,000
International Documentary$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 39% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Independent Documentary: $70k → 16%Liminal Films LLC: $25k → 9%Swell Cinema: $12k → 9%Rainbows and Unicorns LLC: $12k → 10%San Francisco Film Society: $12k → 10%Freedom Bound Center: $12k → 12%International Documentary: $8k → 14%Wild Projects: $12k → 10%Arc of Justice Productions: $20k → 10%Bread & Butter Films Inc: $12k → 10%Kali8 Productions LLC: $8k → 10%Kilgust & Cohen LLC: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northwest Film Forum

Northwest Film Forum incites public dialogue and creative action through collective cinematic experiences. A nonprofit film and arts center located in Seattle, Northwest Film Forum presents hundreds of films, festivals, community events,…

Arts & Culture
2
San Francisco Independent Film Festival

SF IndieFest presents important independent narrative, documentary, and short films from around the world.

Arts & Culture
3
Independent Film Alliance F/K/a Stage 18
—
4
Docs in Progress Inc

Docs in progress is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization which gives individuals the tools to tell stories through documentary film to educate, inspire, and transform the way people view their world.

Arts & Culture
5
Field of Vision Inc

Field of Vision is a filmmaker and artist driven organization that commissions, creates and supports original nonfiction films about developing and ongoing stories around the globe. Field of Vision supports work that uses innovative and…

Arts & Culture
6
American Documentary Inc

A national non-profit media arts organization, american documentary strives to make essential documentaries accessible as a catalyst for public discourse. we collaborate with passionate filmmakers to amplify their voices, nuture the…

Arts & Culture
7
WorkingFilms Inc

Recognizing the power of film to inspire, Working Films positions documentaries to increase civic engagement and shift culture at the local, state, and national level.

Arts & Culture
8
The Filmmaker Fund
Philanthropy
9
Jewish Film Institute

The Jewish Film Institute champions bold films and filmmakers that expand and evolve the Jewish story for audiences everywhere. Through its exhibition and artist development programs, JFI celebrates the spirit of film, inquiry,…

Arts & Culture
10
Reel Earth Films

Reel Earth Films promotes wildlife conservation by creating films that nurture the human connection to nature, spread awareness about life-threatening challenges facing species worldwide, and advance environmental activism and research.

Arts & Culture
11
Film Pittsburgh

To present independent films from around the world to deepen audiences' understanding of culture, tolerance, and common humanity.

Arts & Culture
12
Breaking Through the Lens

Advocate for gender equality in the film industry.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Independent Documentary Inc; the most unlike its peers is Arc of Justice Productions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC: $82,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INCSWELL FOUNDATION: $12,000 · Arts & CultureSWELL FOUNDATIONWILD PROJECTS: $12,000 · Arts & CultureWILD PROJECTSROSIE THE RIVETER TRUST: $12,000 · Arts & CultureROSIE THE RIVETER TRUSTINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INCLiminal Films LLC: $25,000 · OtherLiminal Films LLCEMILY COHEN: $25,000 · OtherEMILY COHENARC OF JUSTICE PRODUCTIONS INC: $20,000 · OtherARC OF JUSTICE PRODUCTIONS INCRainbows and Unicorns LLC: $12,000 · OtherRainbows and Unicorns LLCBread & Butter Films Inc: $12,000 · OtherBread & Butter Films IncSan Francisco Film Society: $12,000 · OtherSan Francisco Film SocietyKali 8 Productions: $7,500 · OtherKali 8 ProductionsTHE FREEDOM BOUND CENTER: $12,000 · Community Improvement
Arts & Culture$125,500Other$113,500Community Improvement$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC: $82,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTHE FREEDOM BOUND CENTER: $12,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSan Francisco Film Society: $12,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetROSIE THE RIVETER TRUST: $12,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Berkeley Film Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Berkeley Film Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Center for Independent Documentary Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Berkeley Film Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Berkeley Film Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $385k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2020, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Berkeley Film’s filings →

More from the funding graph