Skip to content

· Public charity

Bentley University

Organization's mission BENTLEY UNIVERSITY believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world.

$128M
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$78k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$693kScience & Tech$236kEmployment$182kCommunity Improvement$46kCivil Rights$5k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $207,461, the rows itemized in this filing. The $128,132,990 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $127,925,529 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $129k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $78k
$24,849
Median grant
5
States reached
$907M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY$78,030
CARLETON COLLEGE$32,258
MA CONFERENCE FOR WOMEN$30,000
LOUISIANA UNIVERSITIES MARINE CONSORTIUM$24,849
FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY$20,324
MASSACHUSETTS HIGH TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL INC$12,000
THE GREATER BOSTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 72% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $19k → 10%MASSACHUSETTS HIGH TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL INC: $12k → 8%MA CONFERENCE FOR WOMEN: $30k → 16%CARLETON COLLEGE: $83k → 11%FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $81k → 15%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $86k → 18%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $39k → 12%LOUISIANA UNIVERSITIES MARINE CONSORTIUM: $53k → 16%MA CONFERENCE FOR WOMEN: $25k → 16%CARLETON COLLEGE: $68k → 11%FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $38k → 15%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $78k → 18%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $24k → 12%LOUISIANA UNIVERSITIES MARINE CONSORTIUM: $25k → 16%MA CONFERENCE FOR WOMEN: $25k → 16%CARLETON COLLEGE: $61k → 11%FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $20k → 15%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $65k → 18%MA CONFERENCE FOR WOMEN: $25k → 16%CARLETON COLLEGE: $48k → 11%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $64k → 18%MA CONFERENCE FOR WOMEN: $25k → 16%CARLETON COLLEGE: $32k → 11%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $21k → 18%MA CONFERENCE FOR WOMEN: $22k → 16%MA CONFERENCE FOR WOMEN: $20k → 16%MA CONFERENCE FOR WOMEN: $18k → 16%MA CONFERENCE FOR WOMEN: $17k → 16%2020 WOMEN ON BOARDS: $5k → 16%The Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce: $15k → 16%THE GREATER BOSTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $10k → 16%THE GREATER BOSTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 7 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$1.1M
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+335%

Still filing today

57%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Oregon State University Foundation
    5× · 2021–2025 · $315k · revenue -2%
  • CC
    CARLETON COLLEGE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $292k · revenue -2%
  • MC
    MASSACHUSETTS CONFERENCE FOR WOMEN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $207k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
    one grant, 2024 · $19k · revenue +2%
  • 5W
    5050 WOMEN ON BOARDS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +335%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Oregon State University Foundation: $314,523 · EducationOregon State University FoundationCARLETON COLLEGE: $291,582 · EducationCARLETON COLLEGEMASSACHUSETTS CONFERENCE FOR WOMEN INC: $207,000 · EducationMASSACHUSETTS CONFERENCE FOR WOMEN INCFLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $139,277 · OtherFLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITYLOUISIANA BOARD OF REGENTS: $77,374 · OtherLOUISIANA BOARD OF REGENTSREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $62,285 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLO…GREATER BOSTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $34,000 · OtherGREATER BOSTON CHAMBER OF COMMERC…UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $18,898 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF DELAWAREMassachusetts High Technology Council Inc: $12,000 · Other5050 WOMEN ON BOARDS INC: $5,261 · Civil Rights
Education$813,105Other$343,834Civil Rights$5,261

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOregon State University Foundation: $314,523 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCARLETON COLLEGE: $291,582 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS CONFERENCE FOR WOMEN INC: $207,000 over 9y, 25% of budgetGREATER BOSTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $34,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $18,898 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts High Technology Council Inc: $12,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget5050 WOMEN ON BOARDS INC: $5,261 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Oregon State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CARLETON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS CONFERENCE FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts High Technology Council Inc ↗
  • Who funds 5050 WOMEN ON BOARDS INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bentley University funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bentley University. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • University of Delaware: 30% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce: 0% of income from government
  • Oregon State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bentley University’s filings →

More from the funding graph