Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bentley-Shull Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$50kEducation$16kInternational$16kPhilanthropy$10kEnvironment$9kHuman Services$7kHousing & Shelter$7kFood & Nutrition$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$197k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEENS4TEENSHELP$4,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
INDIANA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$1,500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,500
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
THE ILLUMINATION FOUNDATION$1,000
ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$529
SURFRIDERS$500
NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS$500
MEALS ON WHEELS OC$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE ILLUMINATION FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%THE ILLUMINATION FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%THE ILLUMINATION FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%THE ILLUMINATION FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%THE ILLUMINATION FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%THE ILLUMINATION FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%THE ILLUMINATION FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$121k · 16 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +93% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
4

Total granted

$121k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+93%
+32%

Still filing today

50%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentFood & NutritionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +98%
  • Indiana University Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +97%
  • TH
    TEENS4TEENS HELP
    4× · 2022–2025 · $13k · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • TH
    THOMAS HOUSE TEMPORARY SHELTERgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +32%
  • K
    KCET
    one grant, 2017 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
2
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
3
Orange County Technology Action Network

Octane connects people and ideas with capital and resources to fuel technology growth in orange county. our members represent orange county technology executive leaders, entrepreneurs, investors, venture capitalists, academicians, and…

Community Improvement
4
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
5
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
6
Intealth

See schedule oto serve the public by:- assuring the qualifications of health care professionals- providing primary-source verification of credentials of health careprofessionals, as they serve throughout the world- supporting international…

Education
7
Habitat for Humanity of Orange County Inc

Habitat for humanity's mission is to give witness to the christian gospel by working with god's people to build decent habitats for those who are inadequately sheltered in orange county.

—
8
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
9
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
10
Mercy House Living Centers

Mercy house's most significant exempt activities focus on ending homelessness and providing comprehensive housing and support services. the organization offers homeless prevention, rapid rehousing, permanent supportive housing, and…

Housing & Shelter
11
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
12
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Orange County Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Waterkeeper Alliance Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $25,950 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODA LIGHT OF HOPE: $6,000 · OtherA LIGHT OF HOPEIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS: $4,500 · OtherNATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESSMEALS ON WHEELS OC: $4,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS OCSURFRIDERS: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · Other+5 more: $4,000 · Other+5 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $16,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FR…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KI…Indiana University Foundation: $16,000 · EducationIndiana Univer…TEENS4TEENS HELP: $13,000 · HealthTEENS4TEENS…Illumination Health Home formerly The Illumination Foundation: $6,500 · Human ServicesIlluminatio…WOMENS TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER INC RADIANT FUTURES: $6,000 · Human ServicesWOMENS TRAN…WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC: $8,500 · EnvironmentORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,444 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY SENIORSERV INC: $2,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$53,450International$19,000Education$16,000Health$13,000Human Services$12,500Environment$8,500Philanthropy$2,444Food & Nutrition$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $16,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $16,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTEENS4TEENS HELP: $13,000 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetWATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC: $8,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetIllumination Health Home formerly The Illumination Foundation: $6,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWOMENS TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER INC RADIANT FUTURES: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,444 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY SENIORSERV INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS HOUSE TEMPORARY SHELTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds TEENS4TEENS HELP ↗
  • Who funds WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Illumination Health Home formerly The Illumination Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER INC RADIANT FUTURES ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SENIORSERV INC ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS HOUSE TEMPORARY SHELTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Orange County Community FoundationCA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bentley-Shull Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bentley-Shull Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bentley-Shull Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Bentley-Shull Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bentley-Shull’s filings →

    More from the funding graph