Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bente Engelstoft Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$7kYouth Development$7kInternational$5kHealth$2kPhilanthropy$2kAnimals$1kCivil Rights$1kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,050
Median grant
3
States reached
$23k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Ali Forney Center$5,165
Pasadena Humane Society$1,050
Habitat for Humanity$1,037
LA Food Bank$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Tony's Place: $1k → 16%Tony's Place: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14k · 3 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +773% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
8

Total granted

$14k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+773%
+1%

Still filing today

67%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’25
Housing & ShelterInternationalArts & CulturePhilanthropyCrime & LegalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ALI FORNEY CENTER INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $10k · revenue +15%
  • TP
    Tony's Place
    2× · 2022–2023 · $2k · revenue +773%
  • PP
    Planned Parenthood
    2× · 2022–2023 · $2k

Funded once

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +1%
  • LF
    LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -11%
  • HH
    HAHA HEHE GLOBALgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Habitat for Humanity of La Plata County Inc

To build decent, affordable homes in partnership with families in need.

—
2
Lafh Permanent Housing Corp

Lafh permanent housing corp. i (casa central) has been established to own a 6-unit complex located in los angeles, california, which provides permanent housing for families with low income.

Housing & Shelter
3
Lafh Phase I Qalicb Inc

The mission of the organization is to own the south campus of l.a. family housing, a real estate property leased to l.a. family housing for the purpose of operatingtwo essential programs: bridge housing (bh) and the family solutions center…

Housing & Shelter
4
Habitat for Humanity of Orange County Inc

Habitat for humanity's mission is to give witness to the christian gospel by working with god's people to build decent habitats for those who are inadequately sheltered in orange county.

—
5
American Family Housing

American family housing provides a continuum of housing and an array of services to support homeless and low-income families and adults to secure a stable home, to be an active part of their community, and to achieve a self-sustaining way…

Housing & Shelter
6
Handicap International

Handicap international dba humanity & inclusion (hi) works with people with disabilities and people living in situations of vulnerability, including poverty, exclusion, conflict, and disaster.

International
7
Austin Habitat for Humanity Inc

Through faith in action, austin habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
8
Actblue Civics Inc

To develop and promote innovative fundraising tools and practices that utilize internet technology among social welfare organizations for the purpose of increasing grassroots engagement in social welfare activities, as well as…

Unclassified
9
Hollywood Food Coalition

Hollywood food coalition welcomes people to dinner each night. we rescue and redistribute food daily to other organizations. we care for our immediate community through our wellness program. we build community with and through our…

—
10
California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified
11
West Hollywood Community Housing Corp

The organization develops and operates high quality affordable housing and provides resident services for low-income families, seniors and people with special needs.

Housing & Shelter
12
Aids Foundation Houston Inc

Allies in hope (aih), formerly known as aids foundation houston, inc. (afh), is a nonprofit corporation founded in 1982 and was among texas' first organizations dedicated to hiv prevention education and services. aih provides stabilizing…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Family Housing Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Fulshear Police Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALI FORNEY CENTER INC: $10,319 · Housing & ShelterALI FORNEY CENTER INCPlanned Parenthood: $2,033 · OtherPlanned ParenthoodHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $1,037 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION: $1,022 · OtherLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATIONLA Food Bank: $1,000 · OtherLA Food BankACLU: $1,000 · OtherACLUgivebutter: $721 · OthergivebutterIndividual grant recipient: $721 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTI…Tony's Place: $2,037 · Human ServicesPASADENA HUMANE: $1,050 · AnimalsHAHA HEHE GLOBAL: $1,000 · Arts & CultureACTBLUE CHARITIES INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyFulshear Police Foundation: $50 · Crime & Legal
Housing & Shelter$10,319Other$7,534International$5,000Human Services$2,037Animals$1,050Arts & Culture$1,000Philanthropy$1,000Crime & Legal$50

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALI FORNEY CENTER INC: $10,319 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTony's Place: $2,037 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION: $1,022 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAHA HEHE GLOBAL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetACTBLUE CHARITIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFulshear Police Foundation: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bente Engelstoft Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bente Engelstoft Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bente Engelstoft Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Bente Engelstoft Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bente Engelstoft’s filings →

    More from the funding graph