Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks #867

To inculcate the principles of charity, justice, brotherly love and fidelity; to recognize a belief in god; to promote the welfare and enhance the happiness of its members; to quicken the spirit of american patriotism; to cultivate good fellowship; to perpetuate itself as a fraternal organization, and to provide for its government, the…

$313k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 100% of BENEVOLENT & PROTECTIVE ORDER OF ELKS #867’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 10 grants below total $157,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $312,508 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $155,508 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $125k
$12,000
Median grant
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHENANDOAH VALLEY DISCOVERY MUSEUM$45,000
FREDERICK CO EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$20,000
LOVE TO NIC$20,000
VIRGINIA ELKS YOUTH CAMP$18,100
WINCHESTER RESCUE MISSION$12,000
THE LAUREL CENTER$10,000
ACCESS INDEPENDENCE INC$9,400
AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION$9,000
Individual grant recipient$7,500
FREDERICK CO FAIR ASSOCIATION$6,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$117k · 5 repeat orgs$109k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$117k
$29k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $81k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LT
    LOVE TO NIC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $30k
  • FC
    FREDERICK CO EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $29k
  • VE
    VIRGINIA ELKS YOUTH CAMP
    2× · 2024–2025 · $25k

Funded once

  • CW
    CCAP WINCHESTER
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • IJ
    I'M JUST ME MOVEMENT
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
  • SL
    SPECIAL LOVE
    one grant, 2024 · $6k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Your field
03the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2024–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20242025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SHENANDOAH VALLEY DISCOVERY MUSEUM — $45,000 · OtherSHENANDOAH VALLEY DISCOVERY MUSEUMLOVE TO NIC — $30,000 · OtherLOVE TO NICFREDERICK CO EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $29,000 · OtherFREDERICK CO EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONVIRGINIA ELKS YOUTH CAMP — $25,450 · OtherVIRGINIA ELKS YOUTH CAMPACCESS INDEPENDENCE INC — $16,400 · OtherACCESS INDEPENDENCE INCAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION — $16,000 · OtherAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTIONWINCHESTER RESCUE MISSION — $12,000 · OtherCCAP WINCHESTER — $10,000 · OtherTHE LAUREL CENTER — $10,000 · Other+5 more — $32,000 · Other+5 more
Other$225,850

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph