Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

California · Private foundation

Ben and Emma Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
4
Grants FY2025
2
Organizations funded FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$3,243
Largest grant, FY2025
$5,280
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$113k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Education$7kArts & Culture$3k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2024 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Springer Elementary School PTA$90020%
Los Altos Educational Foundation$75010%
Carnegie Mellon University$10010%

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($9k), not named here.

Compare Ben and Emma Foundation with peer funders

About Ben and Emma Foundation

How much does Ben and Emma Foundation give?
Ben and Emma Foundation reported 4 grants totaling $9,273 in its FY2025 IRS filing.
What does Ben and Emma Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2024 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (68%), Arts & Culture (32%).
Who are Ben and Emma Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2024 to FY2025: Springer Elementary School PTA ($900), Los Altos Educational Foundation ($750), Carnegie Mellon University ($100).
Does Ben and Emma Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Where is Ben and Emma Foundation based?
Ben and Emma Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 5 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ben and Emma’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home