· Public charity
Bartholomew J Lawson Foundation for Children
To improve the wellbeing of children.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2017
- $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WINDREF GRENADA | $51,085 |
| FUND FOR ORPHANS AND ELDERLY | $20,000 |
Where the grant dollars land
Across the US and around the world.
US giving: 0% of grant dollars ($0). The 100% that went abroad ($71k) is mapped below.
Beyond the US: 100% of all-years giving ($71k)
1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
How this is measured
1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 2 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Bartholomew J Lawson Foundation for Children funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bartholomew J Lawson Foundation for Children. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Bartholomew J Lawson Foundation for Children?
Find your warmest path to Bartholomew J Lawson Foundation for Children through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Bartholomew J Lawson Foundation for Children’s filings →