Skip to content

· Private foundation

Barry B and Marilyn Eiland Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$150k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Civil Rights$280kInternational$150kFood & Nutrition$120kHousing & Shelter$95kEnvironment$500
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $145k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC$40,000
ACLU FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC$35,000
HOUSTON FOOD BANK$25,000
PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION$25,000
STAR OF HOPE MISSION$20,000
GARY GREENE REALTORS FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%KIDS MEALS INC: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$615k · 8 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
4

Total granted

$615k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+8%

Still filing today

88%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalCivil RightsHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesEnvironmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ACLU Foundation of Texas Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $160k · revenue +30%
  • The Houston Food Bank
    6× · 2020–2025 · $115k · revenue +36%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $90k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • HB
    HOPE BORDER INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue 0%
  • UA
    Ukraine Aid
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -91%
  • KM
    KIDS' MEALS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +106%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Civil Liberties Union of Texas Inc

The ACLU of Texas works with communities, at the State Capitol, and in the courts to protect and advance civil rights and civil liberties for every Texan, no exceptions.

—
2
Hope for Ukraine Inc

To empower communities and individuals in ukraine by providing responsive humanitarian aid, fostering sustainable solutions, and advocating for a peaceful future. we are dedicated to supporting those in need, addressing various aspects of…

International
3
Lone Star Legal Aid

Lone star legal aid's ("lsla") mission is to protect and advance the civil legal rights of the millions of texans living in poverty by providing free advocacy, legal representation, and community education that ensures equal access to…

Crime & Legal
4
Target Hunger Inc

The mission of Target Hunger is to alleviate hunger and its root causes in the Houston neighborhoods we serve. Target Hunger is on the front lines of hunger every day through its food distribution system that includes multiple food…

Human Services
5
Houston Bar Foundation

The Houston Bar Foundation supports programs that help provide legal representation to the indigent, promote community understanding of our legal system, and foster the administration of justice.

Crime & Legal
6
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
7
Hollywood Food Coalition

Hollywood food coalition welcomes people to dinner each night. we rescue and redistribute food daily to other organizations. we care for our immediate community through our wellness program. we build community with and through our…

—
8
Memorial Hermann Medical Group

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
9
Houston Local Information Initiative Inc

The Houston Local Information Initiative, Inc. provides public service journalism that reflects the civic needs of the diverse communities comprising Greater Houston.

Arts & Culture
10
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
11
Central Houston Civic Improvement Inc

Central houston civic improvement lnc.'s mission is to ensure the continued vitality and to support development of downtown and the central city that is critical to the continued health and growth of houston.

Community Improvement
12
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Star of Hope Mission; the most unlike its peers is Ukraine Aid. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ACLU Foundation of Texas Inc: $160,000 · Civil RightsACLU Foundation of Texas IncPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION: $75,000 · Civil RightsPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATIONThe Houston Food Bank: $115,000 · OtherThe Houston Food BankMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC - DOCTORS WITHOUT: $50,000 · OtherMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $90,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTI…HOPE BORDER INSTITUTE: $15,000 · InternationalHOPE BORDER INSTITUT…Ukraine Aid: $10,000 · InternationalUkraine AidSTAR OF HOPE MISSION: $75,000 · Housing & ShelterSTAR OF HOPE MIS…GARY GREENE REALTORS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterGARY GREENE REAL…SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $30,000 · Crime & LegalKIDS' MEALS INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesCOMMON GROUND COMMUNITY INC: $500 · Environment
Civil Rights$235,000Other$165,000International$115,000Housing & Shelter$95,000Crime & Legal$30,000Human Services$5,000Environment$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetACLU Foundation of Texas Inc: $160,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $115,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $90,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTAR OF HOPE MISSION: $75,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGARY GREENE REALTORS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetHOPE BORDER INSTITUTE: $15,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetUkraine Aid: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetKIDS' MEALS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMON GROUND COMMUNITY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Barry B and Marilyn Eiland Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Barry B and Marilyn Eiland Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Barry B and Marilyn Eiland Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Barry B and Marilyn Eiland Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Barry B and Marilyn Eiland’s filings →

    More from the funding graph